nevertheless, the bank used that report to make the case that it had been exonerated. nice trick, right? somebody turns up something fishy in your behavior, you say, oh, i m shocked to hear those terrible allegations, i ll look into it. and then you don t at all look into it, but you produce a report and you wave it around, and you tell everybody it exonerates you, nothing to see her, i checked it out, it s fine. the alfa bank server story is absolutely still live. first, we re aware russian banks are coming up over and over and over again when it comes to contacts and the trump organization and trump campaign, contact with the trump side has been keeping secret for months and months now. now that we re aware of the role of russian banks in the trump and potentially the kushner business dealings that overlap with the campaign, the focus on the banks is getting hotter and hotter. but the alfa bank-trump tower server story is also still live,
he simply likes to keep his personal business personal or, i almost forgot, he didn t pay any taxes. i get that taxes thing. a final one being, it didn t hurt him as a candidate. it probably won t hurt him, he s decided, as president. but this russia stuff, what are we to make of this giant secret? what jusfies keeping secret that has, as long as it s been a secret, thrown his presidency into a dungeon about the key thrown away? why does he put himself down there with the rats and the other vermin? why does he choose to live in darkness, locked day and night in this russia story so he can t enjoy an hour of joy in his presidency? just how bad can the truth be? did he and his son-in-law sit down and figure how to use the american presidency to build some hotel chain with russian money? why the hush-hush? why the lawyering up, the fifth amendment stuff, the endless foot dragging?
with every country it has these kinds of agreements, including us, including the u.s. they keep some information out of the public domain for very good reasons in terms of how you protect nuclear technology secrets, in order to not let this information get out. is the iaea keeping secret some of these details, even to secretary of state john kerry? no, so what was very important, this is an important point. it was very important for us in our p 5 plus 1 counterparts to be briefed on all the details of the iaea s arrangements with iran, when it am coulds to possible military dimensions. we ve been briefed on those in detail, our experts are comfortable with that arrangement, and they can brief congress on that, and they will. stand by, marie harf from the state department will be here when we come back. [ male announcer ] some come here to build something smarter.
or policy that has happened in texas since the explosion in west. he said that state agencies, henceforth, must withhold this information from the public. upon review, we find the submitted information about chemical storage in texas is now confidential. it wasn t before, but now it s confidential. attorney general greg abbott issuing that legally binding opinion in may. he did so rather quietly. the press in texas, however, noticed, and last week greg abbott was asked how on earth this made sense. why should the state now start keeping secret from the people in texas this information that people used to be able to get? why should this now be secret? now that we ve had this great disaster and everybody s worried about it. why can t we know now? we used to be able to know. this was greg abbott s response. you know where they are if you drive around. let s bear this down. if you re living in west, texas,
public had a right to know that information for decades. the state maintained and provided that information. but not anymore. in may, greg abbott, as attorney general of the state of texas, he issued the one change in law or policy that has happened in texas since the explosion in west. he said that state agencies, henceforth, must withhold this information from the public. upon review, we find the submitted information about chemical storage in texas is now confidential. it wasn t before, but now it s confidential. attorney general greg abbott issuing that legally binding opinion in may. he did so rather quietly. the press in texas, however, noticed, and last week greg abbott was asked how on earth this made sense. why should the state now start keeping secret from the people in texas this information that people used to be able to get? why should this now be secret? now that we ve had this great disaster and everybody s worried about it. why can t we know now? we used to be able