local d.a. or u.s. attorney, has taken that. there nothing in the koch trueing about this at all.t. there present. i have the memo right here: is,e can t have one branch of the government paralyzing with president of united states incape coucapable of properly defending himself they concluded we can t indict a sitting president, and say because of this argument he could pardon
charges have expired. expighat would be interestin to. look at. but, you know, merrick garland said something over the weekend in merrick response to the whistleblower testimony. he said, weisse had complete authority. weiss had more authority tha aut a special counsel. my question to theio attorney generalornegenera is, e is the proof of that? is he really so naivo naive, mek garland, that he thinks that he can give oral authority to to david weiss to bring that prosecution? he h? e can t. david weiss needed a letter from merrick garland if he was denied by the u.s. attorney in d.c., in california, needed a letter by merrick garland designating him as a special counsel or grand puba or whatever you to call him to bring that case. that is how it is done, first of all. first of all, you need approval from doj tax and thehe u.sn if the u.s. attorney refuses you, you need a letter from merrick garland.
he understands it well. i hope the staff understands also what we re trying to do. we ve got to bring our country together. ke can t continue to split and go farther apart. we just can t do that. we ve got to work together and that takes a lot of time and energy. reporter: you know, republicans are not eager tour hand president joe biden a win on any sort of piece of his agenda. and they won t help in figure if it doesn t advance their own midterm agenda. so this is a huge factor in why republicans and democrats can t seem to negotiate a deal on infrastructure and other issues that democrats have been eager to work with republicans on and the white house has been eager to work with republicans on. the bottom line is that manchin is not done trying to emphasize working with republicans, this bipartisanship that he is so vocal about. and democrats need to listen to him, in the end, they need his vote on whatever passes through the senate. daniella diaz, appreciate your reporting. tha
there s a whole other world that president trump engages in and he talks about. we can t see that world, if you will. let s not forget with barack obama. he inherited the worst economy since the 30s. he turned this economy around. unemployment rates were down. and donald trump inherited one of the strongest economies. all of obama s policies. this upward drive is going to happen. it didn t bring everybody along but it had a long way to go. racism is at the root of this message. 40% of his die-hard supporters that ke can t grow from politically. a lot of this is rooted they disagree that an african-americ african-american, but a person of color, inherited the halls of the white house. that s why he can keep talking
talking point there, it is a little bit ridiculous. you are suggesting, because drugs come in via ports of entry, airplanes, and probably our northern border, too, that we should somehow ignore the southern border and the wall? that s like saying, we have a drug problem in the neighborhood so let s ignore the burglaries. this is just a really ridiculous, outrageous liberal talking point that makes absolutely no sense. if we can put up a physical barrier and stop some parts of portion of the drug blow, then we should come and we can handle the ports of entry problem with a port of entry solution. the problem is that, i know that when we liberals w speak, e can t hear us. i want you to hear me. where you are not saying we don t have a solution and a we don t want to do something. but my point is, if you have drugs coming, as you mention, from the northern border, because we have poor borders, and if you have drugs coming through ports of entry, pennsylvania, or the l.a. ports in califo