that the woman declined to be interviewed and told friends she doesn t have any memory of what took place. the president certainly is not mincing any words in this tweet. quote, i call for the resignation of everybody at the new york times involved in the kavanaugh smear story, while you re at it, the russian witch hunt hoax. they ve taken the old gray lady and broken her down, destroyed her virtue and ruined her reputation. kirsten powers is here, also rich lowry. kirsten, is there any explanation i mean it just does it seem incomprehensible to you the new york times would have dropped the ball like this? i can t come up with a good explanation. i mean people obviously make mistakes. this is a pretty big one, and i think that i don t think the fact that she doesn t remember it means that it didn t happen because she may have been, you know, so inebriated that she doesn t remember it. but it is something that you do need to include in the story, i think, to have the full st
point out that the woman, according to her friends, does not remember the alleged incident, especially in the wake of that editor s note that randi referenced, which, again said that the woman did not decline to be interviewed and told friends she doesn t have any memory of what took place. the president certainly is not mincing any words in this tweet. quote, i call for the resignation of everybody at the new york times involved in the kavanaugh smear story. and while you re at it, the russian witch hunt hoax, which is just as phony. they ve taken the old gray lady and broken her down, destroyed her virtue, and ruined her reputation. perspective now from usa today columnist and cnn political analyst, kirsten powers and rich lowry. kirsten, is there any explanation i mean, it just does it seem incomprehensible to you that the new york times would have dropped the ball like this? i can t come up with a good explanation. i mean, people obviously make mistakes. this is a prett
original article. steve: the new york times. ainsley: they were interviewed over the weekend and robin is one of those writers. she said they included a lot of this information in the original article. she said the female s name. her friends said she had no recollection of the event and she declined to be interviewed. that was all in the original. they have say the editors took some of that information out. steve: of the new york times story. ainsley: that s right. listen to. this we had her name and you know the times doesn t usually include the name of the victim. and so i think in this case the editors felt like it was better to remove it. in removing her name they removed the other reference she didn t remember. editing done in the haste of the editing process. were you involved in the decision to amend this and do the correction, the addition online to the piece. there was so much heat. you know, everyone has been seething on various aspects of this. we didn t want this
there. they put in there that her friends said she had no recollection of the event and she declined to be interviewed but then the writers, who were on some of the sunday shows over the weekend said the editors read our article and they took that information out. they still printed it. brian: i would like to add two things the new york times news section is now saying we will pitch this by our reporters they write usually the wall street journal s the wall street stories. and we walked away from it because of this. the washington post said yeah, we had this story a year ago. we didn t print it because there was not enough in it. steve: we couldn t corroborate the story. that s the problem for the new york times. they left out that big detail that the gigantic blockbuster story. the woman involved could not would not comment on it. and did not remember it. sarah sanders once upon a time the president s spokesperson revealed the biggest problem for the news media is well,
manufacturing fund in corning. sole we are more than doubling down a quarter of a billion dollars and it s going to go towards further advanced technologies, retrofitting processes for the future. and we couldn t be more excited. so a huge investment inside this corning facility which actually since 2006 has been making the super strong glass that has been on the iphone since it s rollout in 2007. steve: bret, famously, when steve jobs introduced the first iphone he held one up and it had a plastic screen. and then, you know, a week or two later he was complaining to the engineers this is getting all scratched up. this phone will not launch with a plastic screen. it s got to be glass and that s why they turned to corning. that is absolutely the story. we heard about the famous phone call that steve jobs made to the corning people