boston astro bustros. a republican superpac told donors that it has boosted enthusiasm and a few vulnerable candidates were looking stronger in polg. however, according to a new washington post/abc poll just out, most americans disapprove of kavanaugh, and certainly of his confirmation. in fact, when asked how the kavanaugh debate would impact their midterm vote, slightly more said they would be inclined to support democrats over republicans because of this confirmation. but women say it draws them towards democrats over republicans by a 16-point margin. i ve got to go back to you on this, adrienne. this kavanaugh thing has not been good for republicans when it comes to women no. and i think we kind of knew this all along, chris. i m not quite sure why republicans on a senate judiciary committee in particular thought that having an all white male panel of republicans essentially not believing dr. blasey ford would
keep in mind that hundreds of thousands of american men died to stop the 1,000 year reich. and ann awful lot of their children and grandchildren grew up in this country to vote for donald trump, only to be called were doing it. not that mr. harvard law school knows any of that. he probably couldn t tell you the year that the second world war ended. he doesn t care. history means nothing to revolutionaries, and that s why they keep repeating it. the author of the book the diversity delusion. now a united states civil rights commissionerhe. this kavanaugh debate has been inserted enforced by the left. questions of race and gender, which, certainly race is not inherent to the story at all. ital is part of a political tactic. what is the tactic that we are watching? well, tucker, as a close observer of academia, i thought i was incoherent, i thought i
protesting, exercising their democratic rights, somehow being an example of breaking the rule of law, when you have people who are protesting. many people thought they were astroturf protests as well, right. protesting basketba ining obama. and then to have these very different reactions. what you see here is brazen hypocrisy. what the democrats need to do is call them what they are, they re hypocrites. the average american looking at all of this, do they view all of it as just hype epartisanshi or are they able to factually delineate things? i don t believe there s factual delineation going on between both parties. the frustration during the kavanaugh debate was there was a presumption of guilt. that s where i think the rule of law that the president has been speaking about over the past day comes from. and i would also say showing up
who are potential 2020 dems, everybody from michael avenatti, who probably didn t do himself any favors with democrats, john hickenlooper. a crowded field, jackie. you did see elizabeth warren coming out and saying she s considering it, right? no one puts baby in a corner as all these other democrats, we re having the spotlight on them by virtue of having this kavanaugh debate. yes, the field is wide right now and we ll see who takes off. given the climate, given who they have to run against, i think democrats are really going to be focused on picking a winner this time. of course, they always are, but i think right now in particular. and some of the weaknesses and strengths of these candidates will come out in short order rather than perhaps waiti iningl the nomination comes. president trump, here is what he had to say about elizabeth
perhaps a different nominee is the right one. if you re considering someone to be president of a university, ceo of a university and host of a sunday show, it would make sense to take steps back to investigate them and see if you can resolve them. that s why i was happy senator flake took a tough step last week and asked for an fbi investigation. let me get your comment about earlier this week when he believed things changed in this whole kavanaugh debate. take a listen. i think this process changed dramatically when mr. avenatti entered the picture. i think a lot of people, including my democratic colleagues felt like then at that point we had gotten into the foothills of preposterous. he was referring to lawyer michael avenatti, who is thinking about running for president, who ended up representing somebody whose