[the star-spangled banner] [the star-spangled banner] [the star-spangled banner] [the star-spangled banner] [the star-spangled banner] [the star-spangled banner] pete: you continue to deliver. fantastic photo for our nation s and some. thank you to our viewers sending that in. we ve got kayleigh mcenany. i don t often do this, give such attention to the lone star state. i ve been looking good on the internet, looking a lot of places across texas and something popped up about vermont. it is gorgeous. in understated mountains and the northeast can be not just quaint but beautiful. pete: why would you take vermont when you could take new hampshire? a real freedom st. vermont is like how do you will block the two apart? will: you went to different trash than i did. pete: negative connotations. will: with all of that. all i said was vermont is pretty. pete: it is not beautiful. it is terrible. there is no freedom there. kayleigh: always have politics mixed into it.
1/3 and fourth batch of previously sealed documents have been released. this is the headline. epstein invoked the fifth amendment 500 times during depositions that are part of these releases and skirted questions about bill clinton, a ton of names but we should be clear if your name is associated with jeffrey epstein, we leap to the idea your name was somehow included in criminal activity. there are suggestions towards that with bill clinton but a lot of these celebrity names are simply people that were asked, an attorney would have said to a witness did you ever hear the name leonardo dicaprio end of the witness goes no, your name is still attached in part of these releases. it is unfortunate some people will be dragged into that sort of allegation but the bigger question is what were the conversations in the doj pertaining to charge or not charging these other people.
will: the supreme court announcing it will decide whether trump can remain on the 24 primary ballot in colorado and across the nation. similar lawsuit still pending in more than a dozen states are tempting to remove trump s name from the ballot. constitutional law attorney katie turkcowski. we will talk about what the supreme goal be considering when it comes to these cases. it is what, a section of the constitution that bars someone who has helped ferment an insurrection against the government from running for elected office. does trump apply? that s exactly the question. it was inevitable the supreme court was going to take up this case because this section of the constitution has never been interpreted by the supreme court and it it s applicability