Work with. Big the determine how pie is going to be, it gets a lot easier to work out how big to be. Ice is going once you work out how much the gets to work then its much easier to the out the details of budget. Once they have master agreement they know will pass the house theres thete, then will of the leadership of the pass and the senate to Appropriations Bills in regular whole lot becomes a asier and becomes harder for the whole process. Very hard for us to rationalize why we ought to Central Payments to multimillionaire farmers. So the whole argument about the there are s is a number of nuances to that. And the second part of it is, think its been extremely hand fisted the way the republicans have handled the whole issue of nutrition d stamp program, so forth, the fact we have 48 million americans on when it was originally designed for 2 million or 3 million americans, deserves sue that serious attention, okay . Why is that . What are we doing . Have the answers, but i why it bec
Monday morning. [laughter] cannot prefer an answer that would say it is remedial, but i believe if we could go back to the drawing board and that we could practice in this country or all countries could meet on thequal footing, where all participants in an economy would have input and a say and let their concerns be addressed you could create something new on a global scale that could work. I dont Say Something cant be done, but the way it is right now we have a system that is based really on exclusion, not included in. We know it is not working. The solution, i would have to think about that for a lot longer period of time. It is a very big question and it is bigger than we can answer here. I thought about it and if you go ch. Org,website, tradewat there is a Global Organization called, our world is not for sale. That is unions, consumers, environmental, religious groups around the world. They lay out some principles of what good global trade system would have. I would summarize it ve