Katie, card well, carney, they speak of the reduced expectations of privacy that you have in a vehicle as compared to a fixed dwelling or building. If the court were to draw a line it would certainly have some healthy pedigree in the courts previous decisions. Unless there are further questions, thank you. Thank you, mr. Cox. Mr. Fitzgerald, four minutes remaining. Thank you. Just a few points in rebuttal here. So the curtilage is protected as part of the home. And if we look back historically speaking, the automobile exception is born at a traffic stop in the 1920s. The automobile exception, as it is created, makes sense in that context. But the automobile exception has grown. Its become a categorical exception. We no longer look for exigency on a casebycase basis. Now the automobile exception is literally knocking at the door of the house. And the question is whether to apply this exception, created based on exigent circumstances in 1925, to a search of the curtilage of a home. Now o
Senators, representatives, ladies and gentlemen, it is my pleasure and honor to present to you the honorable john hickenlooper, hickenlooper, governor of the state of colorado. Hi. So as a lastminute change. Please, thank you. At a time when sometimes shouting seems to have replaced talking and insults sometimes seem to replace ideas, i want to start by honoring the men and women who join me in this chamber and those who have made it their lifes work to serve the people of colorado. Driven by their abiding desire to serve and to make our great state even greater. President grantham, speaker duran, members of the General Assembly, Lieutenant Governor lynn and her husband jim, justices of the supreme court, attorney general kaufmann, treasurer stapleton, secretary of state williams, southern ute councilman frost, ute mountain chairman cuthair, and vice chairwoman cuthair root. Members of the state board of education, mayor hancock, other elected officials in attendance. My hardworking ca
Posted by the American Folklife Center at the library of congress. It is about an hour. I want to express our collective gratitude to the men and women who engaged in the struggle as members of sncc or naacp half a century ago and continue to keep the fires burning in the present day. We had the privilege of interviewing several of those remarkable individuals who joined the initiative known as the civil rights history project. We are indebted to them in ways that have not been fully acknowledged or articulated. I know some panelists are here. We have one or two other members also part of the freedom struggle. Mulhollandand joe joan mulholland. The recordings are now available online. At halftime [laughter] at lunchtime, the sports metaphors, oozing out of every pore. At lunchtime, as we say in the library, you can check out some of the interviews. They are all live and available to you. If you have not done so, please avail yourself of that. It is great to have one of our lead intervi
Racial nature of the war. The last time i asked you, is it racial baggage . Patrick, is going to be leading us off in session. What have you got . The main topic is the distances nation. In many ways to define it as a disregard of a prewar, moral or legal norms morning wore, usually as a result of legal norms during war. It is manifested and the pacific ,ar as a firebombing of tokyo targeting civilian areas. Of thephy collecting individual soldiers and general transition from the goal of the war to be a military defeat toward racial stigmatization. My first question for the class would then be, what is the purpose of laws of war . Philosophy on this . Whatever you want. Laws of war. To establish, the expectations for soldiers in order to practical value and then who follows the laws. And more inclined to surrender and people when they are captured and what is interesting about them if you do not really see them on either side of the civil war as much as in other theaters. Why . A good
And the professor of strategic studies, so welcome tammy, and we have sarah shard, whos our second sarah panelist today and sarah is the author and contributing editor for the solitary watch website and shes a university a uc berkeley visiting scholar, so welcome and without further adieu, i will give it over to bob to start, each panelist will have about ten minutes to speak, and after that well go right into audience participation and questions. Again as a reminder, students will be invited to come and ask questions first. So bob, thanks so much. Thanks everybody for coming today, its great to be here, youre especially remarkable for coming to the topic which is not exactly easy to swallow, i think for most people. In fact, talk about euphemisms, it always sticks in my craw when we talk about dead innocent people. So lets try not to use that. So im certainly not going to use it in my presentation. Its hard for me to talk about this, because it it immediately becomes very personal for