nothing like this has ever been seen in the history of american presidential politics. so, there s such a fast skeam played with the truth. on this issue, last week, the russia investigation was a hoax, now it s real and president obama didn t do enough. the question is, president trump is the president of the united states. if the united states was attacked, what is he doing about it? real quick, you came from different administrations but both worked on this issue. is it conceivable or possible the intelligence committee is taping a conversation without the president knowing it? absolutely not. the idea there would be political spying going on in the united states. it s a myth that s been prop kated by edward snowden type. i can t see this coming from any responsible national security
seats if you look at the dem grachgz the district they have very little reason to think they could win but the base was fired up. so we re talking about ha happens if the republican losses and how that will cause a pan nirk across the republican party if the if the democrats can t win a race, the numbers show they have a chance, what happens then? right. there are 23 districts that hillary won that were republican congressman so thoefrz the top ones. this one is very close. trump won by 1.5 points. very close, college ed pay the kated people. this is the one that democrats need to win some like this. it s in the suburbs, wealthy area. i think you have a lot of democrat people that trump is very unpopular. had is the kind of race they want to win it will be a symbol for other people that are thinking about running. if we talk about republican losing, there will aban equal panic. this is not good stair fore for trump. had one of the districts where he just eek today out. donald tru
no. and it is time for the supreme court to get some clarity and move on from there. if they have to revise and rewrite what they want, so it is constitutional, then great. if not, the supreme law of the land can say this is constitutional. kimberly: what do you think greg? greg: i think that it is important that we are having the conversation and saying that everyone is zeno phobic and when you are afraid of terrorism and we should not let a fab bring kated guilt of a law where we are flawed. we have to divorce ourselves
no. and it is time for the supreme court to get some clarity and move on from there. if they have to revise and rewrite what they want, so it is constitutional, then great. if not, the supreme law of the land can say this is constitutional. kimberly: what do you think greg? greg: i think that it is important that we are having the conversation and saying that everyone is zeno phobic and when you are afraid of terrorism and we should not let a fab bring kated guilt of a law where we are flawed. we have to divorce ourselves
on trump s part here was to fire comey thinks that was going to get him out of this investigation or in end the investigation early. what he s got now, he s got a special council dead state kated to one job and that is investigating this russia thing. so now the president and everyone in the trump administration, thaw don t have comey who s also got to run the fub looking at this investigation, they have one prosecutor dedicated to this job with almost unlimited staff and resources and so i think by getting rid of comey to end the investigation it s going to backfire. if someone was colluding with russians and the president didn t know about it because he said as far as i m concerned. if he didn t know about it at the time could he still be guilty of break the law? no, if he had no idea of what s going on he s not guilty of breaking the law. he could be guilty of obstruction after he realizes there s an investigation and