fourth response to recommendations around disallowing the use of employee hra options, i would recommend that it states it will not be implemented, the hra are important to businesses and with respect to complying with the chro, they use appropriate tools to make benefits readily available to their employees and with regards to the response of recommendation number 5, i suggest we state that it not be implemented with regards to eliminating time limits. it defer tos the public health response, so thank you for listening to that, and i m making a motion that we revise the motion that included these findings and revise them as i had just stated on the record. and to budget and legislative analyst, anything to add? no, we have all of the information and if the motion is approver, we will revise the resolution part. i m in agreement with those changes so we ll take that without objection. and just in closing remarks, i know this is an issue that obviously has a lot of per
implement those recommendations, for the first recommendation, i think we state that recent amends to the hcso adequately address the issue of consumer fraud, the board of supervisors support businesses identify how to cover their cost within the individual business models as long as it is done within compliance of the health care ordinance. such investigations are within the purview of the state..[reading].. tax collector. excuse me, president chu, are you specifying this recommendation will not be implemented? correct, for recommendations 1, 2 and 3. with recommendation 3, the finding should be that the board of supervisors defers to the district attorney s ongoing investigation, the board does have the power to require to pursue recommendations so this recommendation cannot be implemented by the board. going to the findings related to employer s health reimbursement accounts, finding number 8, disagree, and for this, the board of supervisors refers to the olse s respon
we often talk about bringing the housing authority closer, inside the family. this is our attempt to do just that. in the vain of transparency, i want to provide a cost break down for this broadcasting. there is no cost to utilize the space. we thank the city council for being flexible and working with limited resources. the sfgov tv cost are $35,000 annually for 24 meetings. and we would like to thank them for being flexible and willing to do this. supervisors, it s our office s opinion that the cost associated with increasing a citizen s access to democracy and promoting government accountablity. we hope to work with the implementation of this very important project. additionally, supervisor olague would like to thing her co-sponsors, supervisors mar and kimm as they have worked with residents of the housing authority sites. we don t have the need for a staff report on this, but i should point out that henry alvar alvarez, the director of the authority is in the audience to
francisco police commission. it is an independent agency, separate and apart from the police department. the police commission is also a civilian body. office of citizen complaints investigate civilian complaints against san francisco police department and make policy recommendations on sentences go police department policy. in california law enforcement agencies must cover procedure to investigate complaints by members of the public against peace officers. the otc serves that purpose. our office is staffed by a diverse group of civilians who have never been san francisco police officers. the office of citizen complaint is that 33-member staff, the majority of which are investigators, and the balance of this faq consists of attorneys and sports support staff. to that end, office of citizen complaints mission is to ensure police accountability by conducting fair, timely, and unbiased sourcrecommendations. we when we conduct an investigation, we do so to figure out what hap
three examples of community policing better hope are replicated in other neighborhoods. >[applause] my name is karen huggins, president of the holly courts resident council. i have three of my board members here with me. will you please stand? thank you. thii just want to say we totally except and would request that this general order be accepted tonight, 1.08. we would like to think captain sir you have been doing community policing ever since he became captain for us. this is just secondary. i would like to also thank officers that we have for holly courts. hopkins and supervisor davit compost, thank you for returning. thank you so much for opening your door of your office. every month we meant there for many months, 20 of us, sometimes 30 of us. we all got it done. thank you so much. i would like to also personally think capt. was oulazar. he was a great asset to our ad hoc community. and we meet every month. we meet with the d.a. s office, the housing authority, a com