That a lot of people in congress are talking about so we can shed some light be. This is the very distinguished group but i will introduce the two members. E Russian Program and Senior Advisor at the state department during the george w. Bush administration. Paul has expertise in u. S. Russia relations. At that time, i have to say if there was american democracy promotion in russia, not russian interference in the United States but it provides you with a certain perspective. George beebe is truly one of the most insightful and serious american experts of russia. George was a Foreign Service officer, stationed in moscow, became a member, i think it is called Senior Intelligence service; right . Was also director of russian analysis of the cia and before that was special advisor to Vice President cheney who has many of you know was not suspected of particular ways as par as russia was concerned. And george published a very powerful piece several weeks ago where he was raising some questi
Relationships under madonna trump presidency. From the center for the national interest, this is 1. 5 hours. Beebe, former george w. Bush officials. Welcome to the center for national interest. We will have an important conversation about russia and the issues with moscow and americas response. It is an important topic and something that a lot of people, a lot of journalists, a lot of people in congress are talking about so hopefully we will be able to shed some light in addition to a lot of noise we should find around town. This sadis this is a distinguished group. I will introduce chairman of the board, charles byte who has distinguished experience. And also with us the Congressional Commission on u. S. Nation interests. The commission which actually made the recommendation before september 11th. Recommendati recommendations which were praised but not entirely accepted. And roberts, member of our board. Republican from kansas, chairman of the Cultural Committee and former chairman of
Addition to a lot of noise we should find around town. This sadis this is a distinguished group. I will introduce chairman of the board, charles byte who has distinguished experience. And also with us the Congressional Commission on u. S. Nation interests. The commission which actually made the recommendation before september 11th. Recommendati recommendations which were praised but not entirely accepted. And roberts, member of our board. Republican from kansas, chairman of the Cultural Committee and former chairman of the committee on intelligence. A person with a very strong Foreign Policy, Nation Security ba background relevant to our discussion today. We have two speakers. Paul saunders, he is the executive and he is running the Russian Program and Senior Advisor at the state department during the george w. Bush administration. Paul has expertise in u. S. Russia relations. At that time, i have to say if there was american democracy promotion in russia, not russian interference in t
Here, which was recorded on thursday night. We talked about the entire article, but this evening, we begin with the conversation with the president as he looked at the victory by donald trump, and also his own legacy. Here is that part of the conversation. The rest of the conversation and the rest of the article will be discussed with david on david you can read it now monday. Online at newyorker. Com. Charlie what are your thoughts on this . David when president obama gathered his staff into the ,ffice, and it came in waves wednesday morning after the election, he told them, and they want to read this for accuracy. He told them, this is not the apocalypse. He described to them. Youngted to buck up these staffers, who have big futures, potentially. He wanted to buck them up and history does not always move in a straight line. Defeat happens. Reversals happen. The arc of justice, it does not always bend in a straight line. Dly brutalize the metaphor, and he told me the following, i dont
Here, which was recorded on thursday night. We talked about the entire article, but this evening, we begin with the conversation with the president as he looked at the victory by donald trump, and also his own legacy. Here is that part of the conversation. The rest of the conversation and the rest of the article will be discussed with david on david you can read it now monday. Online at newyorker. Com. Charlie what are your thoughts on this . David when president obama gathered his staff into the ,ffice, and it came in waves wednesday morning after the election, he told them, and they want to read this for accuracy. He told them, this is not the apocalypse. He described to them. Youngted to buck up these staffers, who have big futures, potentially. He wanted to buck them up and history does not always move in a straight line. Defeat happens. Reversals happen. The arc of justice, it does not always bend in a straight line. Dly brutalize the metaphor, and he told me the following, i dont