safe. the guy s not serious. not a serious person. he can t be commander in chief. he doesn t have plans. this is all this is all dog whistle talk. this is to provoke anger. this is to generate massive attention to him. chris, sort of striking for its candor, i think. you know? seems to be laying out the way he feels. well, kate, i think some of that candor comes from being he is in the polls. it is amazing to think of and doesn t have that much to lose. nothing he s tried to date worked. i m not convinced going jeb bush attacking donald trump hurts donald trump in a meaningful way. see if he does it in the debate tomorrow night. the difficult thing in trying to attack donald trump as another kand date, he s a political barroom brawler and use any means necessary to win. talk over you. pull facts or maybe not facts
you have a number of people obviously, ari, who are looking at the constitution. to your point, they are wondering if trump s team looked at this before the proposal or was this an example of throwing it out there to see the reaction outside of maybe exclusively inside that rally he was attending. i think you raise such an important point, which is there is the thing, which has been widely condemned here by all these republicans, democrats, security experts, and legal scholars, then there s how they re doing the thing. which is beyond how obnoxious and odious the proposal is. there is the fact that they didn t even put out in any kand of serious way. in other words, if a presidential candidate who wants to be taken seriously, and he was proposing something security oriented and had a legal content, they might have their own lawyers look at it. this goes to a deeper point to ow donald trump runs for president. we know in his business dealings
efforts to defeat the islamic state. the issues he raised that were new, gun control, wouldn t have stopped the attack. it wouldn t have in any way stopped any attacks he could point to involving jihadist terrorism. they rnt with weren t on a watc. the fact that you can take away rights because they were on a list has too many people on it. many are on there for no good reason. i think the president made things more difficult. i think instead of using this as an opportunity to build bipartson consensus, which he needs to do, because polls show his handling slipping with the islamic state, giving the american people a lecture on how to treat each other wasn t helpful. we have presidential kand candidates willing to take any number of steps to limit the
really need to help dig deep into what these kand did thes stand for, what the policies will do, what the impact for the policies are, the american action forum is a conservative c3 in washington, d.c., a think tank. they re talking about a massive cost associated with trying to deport that many people. it would cost billions of dollars. there s legitimate request questions to be asked but let s celebrate we had a good debate with qualified candidates answering questions about what their policy platforms are. john, to you, let s be real about what happened in the 1950s under president eisenhower and what donald trump is proposing. can you please give everybody a history legislati history lesson on what that effort was back then. sure. and i think that s an important reality check. look, i like ike. i think he was an underrated president. but this is not one of the high water marks for his president did i. it was known as excuse me for knowen it as operation wetback. that s what it
see the democratic constituents rally here in south carolina and the country. she s a phenomenal kand did it. you said back in august the e-mail scandal would, quote, be resolved in a fairly short time. she still today faces a fbi investigation to the security of the server. could that be damaging for her moving forward to the point you just made? there are things that could come out. well, i m going to quote bernie sanders and say enough of those e-mails. i think that s the way that people feel about it. we ve heard a lot about it for the last six or eight months. we have had a congressional inquiry. hillary clinton has said it was a mistake and she s at the hearings, she was very clear about all of the questions that were asked her. she answered 11 hours worth of questions. i think people are ready to move on on that. what they want to hear, kate, is getting wage growth going again, addressing the issues we face