also kept a lid on that videoooe footage. and in in some cases, dojts did not share it with criminal defendants who d beeged onn chan on january six in violation of . their constitutional rights. so we felt it wa so we felt it c anrvice to bring what we could to you. there was no justificationd for keeping the secret any longer. a poand a powerful argument to e made that sunlight is always and everywhere. the best disinfectant. it and in fact, because it waso soe video evidence, it is to some extent self-explanatory. anyone could look at the tapapee and decide what he or she thinks of it.very c so the tape we showed lastlearla night indicated very clearlys et that capitol hill police in pro some cases escorted protestersha through the capitol as if they were giving a tour. they did that with jacob.sley translate the so-called q and uncommon ad qanot one poit they even tried to open locked doors on channelize behalf. beha he was sentenced to four years in prison for his cr
footage. and there was a reason for whi that. so a small incl group of people, which include the leaders of the democratic party and their allies in the media, hadt you a complete monopoly on what you were allowedo to know about wht happened, what actually happened inon the capital on january 6th. and they defended that monopoly with great ferocity as monopolies tend to do so.po the moment wliste broks e that monopoly simply by getting access to the footage is not hard. that s what you re suppose to dk to do when you work in the news business. other media outletsth went a outl they all did. and we jusets t couldn twe resie to be self-referential, but it it s too hilarious. so we assembled a montage here it is .hing n what we saw tonight, alison,ewhb from tucker is nothing new .o hesa has been trying to sanitize the very real violence that weth all saw unfold at the u.s. capitol . forty one thousand hours ofil footage from an attempted coup. how on earth i is federal evidence. how