Latest Breaking News On - Justice vijaykumara patil - Page 4 : comparemela.com

Marriage Does Not Eclipse Right To Privacy, Says Karnataka High Court

Marriage does not do away with the procedural rights of a person to divulge his personal information, a Division Bench of the High Court has said.

Justice sunil dutt yadavJustice vijaykumara patilHigh courtDivision benchDivision bench of the high courtSupreme courtJustice vijaykumarAadhaar actSingle judgeAssistant director generalCentral public information officerPublic information officerRight to privacyKarnataka high court

Relationship by marriage does not eclipse right to privacy under Aadhaar Act, says Karnataka High Court

Relationship by marriage does not eclipse right to privacy under Aadhaar Act, says Karnataka High Court
thehindu.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thehindu.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Justice vijaykumara patilA division benchHigh courtIdentification authority of indiaAadhaar actTargeted deliveryDivision benchDutt yadavJustice vijaykumarDeputy director generalCentral public information officerUnique identification authorityInformation act

PC Act | Proceedings By Third Parties Not Judicial Proceedings, Employer Cannot Withhold Pension On Such Grounds: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has recently held that proceedings instituted by third parties against a government employee under the Prevention of Corruption Act ("PC Act"), cannot be construed to fall.

Shivrajs balloliSantoshb malligawadShirish krishnaJustice vijaykumara patilKarnataka power transmission corporation limitedKarnataka electricity board employee service regulationsKarnataka high courtCorruption actJustices sunil dutt yadavJustice vijaykumarSingle judgeWrit appealAdvocate shirish krishnaAdvocate shivrajs balloliCorruption proceedingsPrevention of corruption act

Family Law: All India Half Yearly Digest 2023

SUPREME COURTCriminal Proceedings For Dowry Demand Cannot Be Quashed Merely Because Divorce Petition Is PendingCase Title: X vs State of Uttar Pradesh Case Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 26The Supreme.

Andhra pradeshSouth africaGandhi nagarHimachal pradeshWest bengalJammu and kashmirState of haryanaUttar pradeshMadhya pradeshState of karnatakaTamil naduState of jharkhandUnited kingdomState of assamState of keralaState of andhra pradesh

Karnataka HC Admits X Corp s Appeal After Centre Refuses To Reconsider Account Blocking Orders, Will Decide If Intimation Of Reasons Mandatory

The Karnataka High Court today admitted the appeal preferred by X Corp (formerly Twitter) against the single judge’s dismissal of its challenge to the account blocking orders issued by the Union.

Justice vijaykumara patilJusticeg narendarShreya singhalKarnataka high courtSupreme courtX corpMinistry of electronicsUnion governmentInformation technologyUnion of india othersJustice vijaykumarInformation technology actBlocking rulesBlocking ordersCentral government