supremacy is a significant danger in this country, and not antifa. so what that tells us, though, is the inability of the prosecution to actually cross-examine on the bias of that witness. and then throwing out the misdemeanor gun charge? really? he threw it out. reading the statute, it is not clear to me how that stands. what it means to the jury, essentially, the jury knows there was an illegal weapons charge, and they know the judge took it away. these are very clear signals to a jury what the judge thinks about the case. and we have so many examples in this. and that s a deep problem for the belief that the justice system works. and i do feel like we are in more danger today than we were yesterday. maya, i will follow up with you. these are some of the headlines that the judge earned during the trial. judge says he let rouse randomly select jurors out of a tumbler
this is exactly right. we are sure of what we heard of the one out of 11 black jurors is exactly what black people, black advocates and black lives matter protesters, the people that help protest and took to the streets last summer, these are the things they point to when they talk about how the justice system works. you have one person in this case that not just kind of about race , it s all about race. it s front and center and back. that s part of the conversation. one of the things that s key in this case is whether or not these men have the ability to do citizen arrests. when you talk to experts, one of the things is important is somebody has to see someone doing their crimes in order to do citizen arrest. this case is one of those pushed
damage that this man probably did to them, but that is not the way that the justice system works. our system is an accuser evidenced by the defense and in the jury of the judge ruling on it. in this case that they brought in people that were unrelated to the victim. why not all 50 that you say were harmed by the monster? you may be a predator and everything that the prosecution and the victims allege he is, but this is a system where by you must try this victim, you must try the perpetrator based on the evidence that the state has amassed and the victim s testimony in this case, they embellished it in a way that was wrongful, and i tell you something else in my opinion, this will be reflected in harvey weinstein s appeal as well. they may be monsters, #metoo may have exacted purchase
weeks, there s still a bit of a gap as to what exactly came from the president with respect to why the aid was held and why it was ultimately released. i would love to hear from these people who know firsthand or love to see these documents if they provide some further light on it. that legal need for a methodical case runs up against a political reality which is the calendar. it will take time. so while in a perfect world we would get this information, i understand the democrats hessy tense to push this months into next year. with an uncertain outcome how high they go. should folks at home the takeaway be, obstruction works. it s impeding the investigation. it s really not the american way and our justice system works. if i drag my feet long enough i can effectively grind the wheels of justice and prevent it from
that. they are complaining about a transcript of a deposition that took place saturday about not having that. the chairman took to the microphones actually in the hearing room to make clear that whatever portions the republicans were seeking for the purpose of today s hearing they would make available and that the process right now is the witness is reviewing that transcript. the other complaints seem to be something about the process being unfair. but they did seem to focus, chuck, on trying to suggest that any crime that doesn t have a first hand witness. so any murder that isn t, you know, caught on video camera or witnessed by a dozen people doesn t result in the murderer going to jail. that s not how our justice system works, is it? thank goodness. i think i can explain this if you give me a moment. please. near or at the end of every federal criminal trial the judge holds what we call a charging conference. she asks both sides to propose