comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Justice riyaz chagla - Page 7 : comparemela.com

Bombay High Court Half-Yearly Digest: January To June 2023 [Citations 1

Nominal Index [Citation 1 – 313]World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. v. One OTT Intertainment Ltd. In Centre 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 1Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit v. National Investigation Agency 2023.

Himachal pradeshIndia generalState of haryanaNorth yorkshireUnited kingdomUnited statesState of goaWest bengalNew yorkAndhra pradeshState of uttar pradeshUttar pradeshState of west bengalJammu and kashmirJustice patelChanappa odala

Bombay High Court Weekly Round-Up: June 19 To June 25, 2023

Nominal Index [Citation 283 - 296]Dattaram Govind Naik v. State of Goa 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 283Ranjana Pagar-Gawande v. Nivrutti Kashinath Deshmukh and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 284JIV Maitri Trust v..

State of goaRavindra waikarJustice bharatp deshpandeJustice nitin jamdarJusticekr shriramJusticemm sathayeJustice riyaz chaglaUddhav thakerayJustice milind jadhavJustice sunil shukreJustice bharat deshpandeAryan khanRamhari dagadu shindeGauri godseEknath shankar kambleNivrutti kashinath deshmukh indorikar

Complete Abdication Of Quasi-Judicial Function By Trademark Registrar Rejecting Application Without Considering Submissions: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court recently came down heavily on Registrar of Trade Marks and the Senior Examiner for failing to consider submissions and pass reasoned orders before denying registration of.

New zealandHiren kamodShreyas deshpandeJustice chaglaJustice riyaz chaglaEuropean unionBombay high courtTrade marksSenior examinerTrade markTrade marks actCommercial miscellaneous petitionTrade marks registryProvisional trade markRegistrar of trade marksUasi judicial functions

Mere Fact That Defamatory Statement Was Earlier Made In A Pleading In Court Is No Defence For Repetition: Bombay High Court

Publication of a defamatory statement on the ground that a similar statement was mentioned in a judicial pleading is not a valid defence to justify repetition of that statement, the Bombay High Court.

Advs vijay kurleDilip lunawatAmbar koriNilesh ojhaAdar poonawallaChetan kapadiaChangez keswaniJustice riyaz chaglaHitesh jainYoutuber yohan tengraBombay high courtSerum institute of indiaSerum institute of india pvtSerum instituteSenior advocate aspi chinoyLunawat writ petition

Prima Facie Defamatory: Bombay High Court Orders Removal Of Social Media Posts Against Covishield Manufacturer Serum Institute

The Bombay High Court on Monday directed two individuals to take down prima facie defamatory content against Covishield vaccine manufacturer Serum Institute of India and its CEO Adar Poonawala in a.

Ambar koriAdar poonawalaJustice riyaz chaglaAbhishek mishraYohan tengraNilesh ojhaSupreme courtParinam law associatesSerum institute of indiaBombay high court onBombay high courtSerum instituteRiyaz chaglaAdvocate aspi chinoyBombay high courtOvishield defamation case

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.