Bombay High Court Temporarily Restrains Pune s Regal Footwear From Using Regal Trademark Case Title: Abdul Rasul Nurallah Virjee and Anr. v. Regal Footwear Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 12 .
The PIL petitioner claimed that the HC in 2022 had directed the Railways to modify the concessions which were prevalent before March, 2020 by taking a fresh decision in changed circumstances, however, the Railways failed to restore the said concessions.
Nominal Index [Citation 301 – 619]Bina Saxena w/o Late Ravendra Kumar Saxena v. Union of India 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 301Hemant Dhirajlal Banker v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 302CIT v. M/s.
Nominal Index [Citation 1 – 300]World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. v. One OTT Intertainment Ltd. In Centre 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 1Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit v. National Investigation Agency 2023.
On December 21, after state lawyer, on instructions of Sounik assured about filing of detailed affidavit and sought time for the same, which the court granted and posted further hearing to January 31.