comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Justice masley - Page 5 : comparemela.com

The New Normal? An Update On Commercial Division Operations | Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: COVID-19 has ushered in a new era for litigation in the Commercial Division. Here are the key developments litigants should be aware of. Remote Appearances and No Paper Copies In May 2020, e-filing in the Commercial Division resumed in earnest, with a few important differences from the status quo ante: Most, if not all, appearances in the Commercial Division are proceeding remotely via Microsoft Teams. While the Commercial Division encourages parties to conduct virtual evidentiary hearings and non-jury trials, in-person jury trials will resume on March 22, 2021. Per Administrative Order AO/267/20, paper copies of motions and other documents in e-filed cases are not required in the Commercial Division until further notice. Several Commercial Division Justices in New York County, including Justice Schecter, Justice Masley, and Justice Ostrager, have updated their individual rules to note that working copies are no long

Commercial Division Operation Litigation: COVID-19 Update

Monday, March 8, 2021 COVID-19 has ushered in a new era for litigation in the Commercial Division. Here are the key developments litigants should be aware of. Remote Appearances and No Paper Copies In May 2020, e-filing in the Commercial Division resumed in earnest, with a few important differences from the  status quo ante: Most, if not all, appearances in the Commercial Division are proceeding remotely via Microsoft Teams. While the Commercial Division encourages parties to conduct virtual evidentiary hearings and non-jury trials, in-person jury trials will resume on March 22, 2021. Per Administrative Order AO/267/20, paper copies of motions and other documents in e-filed cases are not required in the Commercial Division until further notice. Several Commercial Division Justices in New York County, including Justice Schecter, Justice Masley, and Justice Ostrager, have updated their individual rules to note that working copies are no longer required.

MH&H Finance & Law Newsletter, Vol IV - February 2021 | Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP

The Courts’ View of UCC Article 9 Sales in The COVID-19 Environment Is Clearly Changing - While the world may be in a state of semi-paralysis waiting for a COVID-19 vaccine, the legal environment involving creditors’ rights has changed significantly during the past several months. In the beginning of the pandemic, we reported that courts viewed Article 9 sales with a more critical eye. For example, we previously reported that Justice Masley of the New York Supreme Court, New York County Commercial Division, issued a decision on June 23, 2020 in D2 Mark LLC v. OREI VI Investments, LLC, holding that a UCC Article 9 sale on thirty-six (36) days’ notice, which required the winning bidder to make a non-refundable deposit of 10% of the purchase price, pay the remaining balance within 24 hours, and precluded the borrower from submitting a bid, was commercially unreasonable because of the dire implications of COVID-19. MHH Blog: Lender Stayed From Proceeding With UCC Article 9 Sale

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.