My point is, in many instances unless were talking ab question of federal constitutional laws, and people are free to decide whether or not they want government involved and if they do, they can make that decision at a state and local level. Ive isolated folks in your book but others on this whole idea about Big Government versus smaller government. Who else would you highlight and why . Mumfet she was a slave in massachusetts. She was a slave in the household of colonel john ashley a prominent figure in massachusetts of john ashley a document later known as she have field declaration was written and document recognized as a matter of natural law but all human beings are free and qawl its human beings in a state of nature are this way. Its who we are, it is what we are. That language from the she have field declaration later migrated and became part of the massachusetts constitution of 1780, of course, pinned by john adams once it became part of the massachusetts constitution, post rev
My point is, in many instances unless were talking ab question of federal constitutional laws, and people are free to decide whether or not they want government involved and if they do, they can make that decision at a state and local level. Ive isolated folks in your book but others on this whole idea about Big Government versus smaller government. Who else would you highlight and why . Mumfet she was a slave in massachusetts. She was a slave in the household of colonel john ashley a prominent figure in massachusetts of john ashley a document later known as she have field declaration was written and document recognized as a matter of natural law but all human beings are free and qawl its human beings in a state of nature are this way. Its who we are, it is what we are. That language from the she have field declaration later migrated and became part of the massachusetts constitution of 1780, of course, pinned by john adams once it became part of the massachusetts constitution, post rev
Roberts and d. C. Circuit court judge Merrick Garland talk about the legacy of the lake Second Circuit appeal Appeals Court jue Henry Friendly. This is just under two hours. Good evening everyone. Im robert katzmann, chief judge of u. S. Court of appeals for the Second Circuit. I welcome each of you on behalf of my court, and where especially honored to have with us are chief justice, John G Roberts junior. [applause] today nearly 500 strong, we celebrate an american judicial giant, henry j. Friendly compuserve for 27 years on the Second Circuit court of appeals, including three years as chief judge. It is a wonderful coincidence, today is the 58th anniversary of judge friendlys appointment by president Dwight D Eisenhower to this court. Our gathering today is at the intersection of two initiatives which have engaged us for two years. The first is the one and 25th Anniversary Commemoration of the Second Circuit court of appeals chaired by circuit judge richard wesley, comprising a seri
Work force. This subcommittee will work to find sense sbl solutions. Federal agencies employ some of the best and brightest individuals this country has to offer. Every day federal Civil Servants protect our communities, keep our airports running safely and smoothly and military running extremely effectively. We are gafl for their diligence. Important work is obstructed by a culture that rewards attendance over initiative, one that does not differentiate between poor performers and those who excel. The high performing often complain that under performing count parts harm work place moral and raise concerns that compensation is not appropriately related to performance. The 2016 federal Employee View Point survey found a mere 22 of employees agreed with this statement. Pay raises depend on how well employees perform their jobs. While the government fails to appropriately compensate employees based on performance managers face additional challenges. Federal managers are frustrated by comp
Attorneys discuss whether federal courts will reverse recent rulings that made it more difficult for individuals to sue in court. Cohosted by the Georgetown University law center and the Constitutional Accountability Center, this is one hour 30 minutes. Hello, everyone. Thank you so much for being here at the Georgetown Law School Supreme Court institute. My name is Elizabeth Wydra and oppression of the Constitutional Accountability Center, a nonprofit Public Interest law firm, think tank and Action Center dedicated to the progressive promise of United States constitution. Cac is delighted to be cohosting this event tonight with the Supreme Court institute and thanks to the institute director. We have a great event here tonight to talk about the important questions of the future of access to courts that as many of you know, while this room is a mock courtroom of the Supreme Court, when you stand outside d. C. And described over the arch of the door equal justice under law. But for many