donnell, goo speaking of geori raised the debt ceiling once. actually twice, that is the george santos way of describing my involvement in raising the debt ceiling a couple of times when i was working in the senate. and the speaker of the house, i ll tell you when negotiations are ongoing. i m going to tell the story of me raising the debt ceiling all by myself, a little bit later in this hour. i will tone down the george santos exaggeration to try to get it somewhere closer to the strike zone of truth. it s always must see television, lawrence, have a great show. thank, you alex. we have breaking news at this hour from a lawsuit in florida, where the judge is now sanctioning donald trump and donald trump s lawyers to the tune of about 1 million dollars, $937,000. this is a lawsuit, the plaintive donald trump brought against hillary clinton in florida, and that suit was dismissed. the judge in the case, in assessing in effect fines to donald trump and his lawyer, say
that does it for us tonight, it is time for the last word with lawrence o donnell, good evening lawrence. speaking of george santos, i raised the debt ceiling once. actually twice, that is the george santos way of describing my involvement in raising the debt ceiling a couple of times when i was working in the senate. and the speaker of the house, i ll tell you when negotiations are ongoing. i m going to tell the story of me raising the debt ceiling all by myself, a little bit later in this hour. i will tone down the george santos exaggeration to try to get it somewhere closer to the strike zone of truth. it s always must see television, lawrence, have a great show. thank, you alex. we have breaking news at this hour from a lawsuit in florida, where the judge is now sanctioning donald trump and donald trump s lawyers to the tune of about 1 million dollars, $937,000. this is a lawsuit, the plaintive donald trump brought against hillary clinton in florida, and that
entire career for what? maybe to help the conservative justice lock in the opinion? i doubt it. i think it had to be one of the justices in the alito majority, and for this non investigation investigation to reach the opposite conclusion of what is plausible and on the basis of no evidence and through a process conducted by a very
liberals on the court of all things for the lead, when everybody with have a brain who knows how the court works understands that the point of the leak was, as you said, lock in the majority and it succeeded. now i do not know that justice alito or justice thomas or ginni thomas, leaks this opinion. i m not going to assert they did, but that is a hell of a lot more likely than that some law clerk would risk his or her entire career for what? maybe to help the conservative justice lock in the opinion? i doubt it. i think it had to be one of the justices in the alito majority, and for this non investigation investigation to reach the opposite conclusion of what is plausible and on the basis of no evidence and through a process conducted by a very nice woman, but without any