after fool s errand. the critics of the court if it overturns the law says it s an activist act by the justices, they re really just taking this law and throwing it out in total, but would it be activist or more activist just to overthrow part of it? well, see, that s the point. well, if they ve struck some parts and not others, they re trading a new law that congress never intended, so, wouldn t it be better, justice scalia argues, to give congress a blank slate. to say, look, you screwed up with this one and this is an important problem and the analogy he drew was to campaign finance law, where in the late 1970 s, they threw out some parts of regulations and political speech and now we just have a mish-mash of contradictory rules. paul: james. judge vincent had the best answer. at the appellate court. the trial court. the best answer to justice
an activist act by the justices, they re really just taking this law and throwing it out in total, but would it be activist or more activist just to overthrow part of it? well, see, that s the point. well, if they ve struck some parts and not others, they re trading a new law that congress never intended, so, wouldn t it be better, justice scalia argues, to give congress a blank slate. to say, look, you screwed up with this one and this is an important problem and the analogy he drew was to campaign finance law, where in the late 1970 s, they threw out some parts of regulations and political speech and now we just have a mish-mash of contradictory rules. paul: james. judge vincent had the best answer. at the appellate court. the trial court. the best answer to justice ginsburg versus a wrecking job.
after fool s errand. the critics of the court if it overturns the law says it s an activist act by the justices, they re really just taking this law and throwing it out in total, but would it be activist or more activist just to overthrow part of it? well, see, that s the point. well, if they ve struck some parts and not others, they re trading a new law that congress never intended, so, wouldn t it be better, justice scalia argues, to give congress a blank slate. to say, look, you screwed up with this one and this is an important problem and the analogy he drew was to campaign finance law, where in the late 1970 s, they threw out some parts of regulations and political speech and now we just have a mish-mash of contradictory rules. paul: james. judge vincent had the best answer. at the appellate court. the trial court. the best answer to justice