Eastern on cspan and cspan. Org and if you are on the go, listen to our live coverage using the free cspan radio app. Attorneys and legal experts talk about the Supreme Courts recent term, preview upcoming cases and the impact the president had on the system. Due to a technical issue, we are joining the panel in progress. To questions. Observationhat my aat i think echoed it, was light term in terms of expectations and had the court split in ways that conservative justice were joining the liberal justices in cases. See you agree this was kind of a quiet for what might come. Case. Rrymandering future portend other decisions that we should be aware of . Like everybody else, i want to say like mickey rooney, im just happy to be in the show. I think canon is right. The term is characterized in part by the cases the court took in the cases they didnt take or postponed taking. Two very high ticket cases were teed up right at the beginning of the term and i think one set of them were actually
From the Federalist Society, this is 90 minutes. Good afternoon and welcome to the federal Society Event on fen citizenship and the census. Im Vice President general counsel and director of groups of the Federalist Society and pleased to welcome you here today. I want to thank the panel and especially the moderator stuart taylor. Before we begin i do want to let you know we had a bit of a medical emergency in the room. A gentle man received assistance and we are told hes going to be fine but if you would like an update coming i, if we get an um the hospital, we will certainly let you know. But our thoughts are with him of course. I mentioned the moderator stuart taylor, an author, journalist here in the washington, d. C. , somewhat of a federal society regular. Youve seen him before, hes wellknown to us. I will introduce halflength but i do want to introduce him for the role of the moderator today. [applause] thank you very much, dean, for coming. Welcome to the Panel Discussion titled
Course. I mentioned the moderator stuart taylor, an author, journalist here in the washington, d. C. , somewhat of a federal society regular. Youve seen him before, hes wellknown to us. I will introduce halflength but i do want to introduce him for the role of the moderator today. [applause] thank you very much, dean, for coming. Welcome to the Panel Discussion titled citizenship the road ahead on issues entitled to citizenship and i said yeah, what else. Its no citizenship the road ahead on issues surrounding the Trump Administration efforts to make publicly available more information about the numbers of citizens, non citizens and Illegal Immigrants in the country. This includes the administrations plan to include a question of citizenship and the census now starting in the year 2030, that is because the Supreme Courts decision in the department of commerce versus new york made it logistically impossible and the attorney generals words to include a question in the 2020 census. We hav
Efficient to give responsibility or congressional districting to political actors. They consciously chose to give the primary authority to state legislatures and then to police the possibility that state legislatures which the framers knew to be partisan institutions would engage in too much partisanship. They chose to Structural Solutions by giving authority. Decided the one person, one vote concept, we were pretty much saying certain acts by the legislature are unconstitutional, including race discrimination and others. Be that simply because the constitution says that a particular act is in the hands of one branch of government that that deprives the courts of reviewing whether that action is constitutional or not. Questionose the whether that ship has sailed is one way of presenting the question in front of the court today. I would submit you dont have a onesizefitsall solution for disability and i dont think this fits that. I took the central lesson to be the same claim, essential
Dissenting. Here is the oral argument from april. Mr. Stewart thank you, mr. Chief justice, and may it please the court the lanham acts ban on federal registration of scandalous trademarks is not a restriction on speech but a valid condition on participation in a federal program. On its face, and as applied here, the provision is is viewpointneutral. The scandalous marks provision is one of many contentbased criteria for federal trademark registration, and consideration of a marks content is essential. Justice sotomayor could you please tell me how youre defining scandalous mark . From your brief, i thought you were giving it a different definition than has been used by the agency for a while. Mr. Stewart well, the the term the adjectives that have sometimes been used as synonyms for scandalous by the agency are terms like shocking, disgraceful, offensive, and disreputable. I think Justice Sotomayor well, if you use all those adjectives, you run headon to tam. Mr. Stewart i think one s