but in fact is george zimmerman, which they may well decide, then it doesn t matter what an expert says. what they re going to do in my opinion is compare the who was screaming evidence to what the injuries indicate. let s remember, trayvon martin wasn t injured except for the fatal shot, george zimmerman had a lot of body injuries. will they hear that expert testimony and give it maybe some consideration? no doubt about it. but when the defense says come on, use your common sense, you listen to the tape, you think about it, who s the one screaming? the one with the injuries or the one without, i don t know. it is not a slam-dunk bit of evidence in my opinion for the prosecution. i want to ask you, obviously a very big case, a very public case, a very emotional case and a case that just about everyone s heard of getting a jury sat is going to be tough. i want to ask you both about it.
letter from aim of 2007 which in melon informs andrew young all haircuts, et cetera that are necessary and important for his campaign, please send the bills to me. it is a way to help our friend without government restrictions. and the jury requested a transcript of a edwards left yog describing an upcoming meeting with mellon saying immediately after lunch she and i will break out into a private session couple of hours. that s when we will do our work including the work about you and making sure you are protected and included. shep? shepard: what are the annual lists saying about what all of this might tell us about this jury? legal experts say at this point it s too early to read the tea leaves and see whether the jury is favoring the prosecution or the defense. however, they say that the evidence jurors are requesting suggest they have been paying attention and taking this case seriously. listen. i think this indicates they are doing their due diligence. the jury sat and watch