through the process is the same. and interestingly enough in this case, the falsity of the statements isn t even a question in a really unprecedented decision, pretrial by the judge . the statements are false. it s just whether or not there s actual malice we could see these jury questions are really tailored to that. here s another question that i think is fascinating joy do you personally know or have any opinion at all about the following persons who may be identified? mike lindell, rudy giuliani, sidney powell, listen bottom line is you want a fair and impartial jury, and if they have particular opinions about those individuals that may be negative or two positive that makes them not fair that makes them ineligible, and that makes them not right for that jury. um okay. and what do you think is going to happen, joy? well let me see as i am a predictor of all things, but nothing you re here. you re here into the future. there s two parts very quickly. one part is liability right is t
voter fraud and then being told that there was none and then going on television and claiming that there was fraud and lying to the audience. what do you make of what the potential jurors were being asked today? questions like, do you personally know or have an opinion on rudy giuliani? sidney powell? mike lindell, the pillow guy? have you ever served as an election judge or volunteered at a polling place? have you ever had any capacity in connection with the 2020 election? besides voting? what do you make of those? what do you read into that typical jury questions that you would ask in a case like this because you you want to get somebody. obviously everybody s heard of the election and donald trump and rudy giuliani, etcetera and fox news. but you want to take it out people who are going to be biased, one way or another. you really just looking for people who are fair and impartial. and so those are the types of questions you would ask jurors to try and weed out the ones that have an
we ll see if the jury at gets to take that into consideration as they look at all of this, but you know, we re a couple of days away now from this whole thing started starting, and it s been actually just bad news after bad news after bad news for fox, it s hard to see here what their case is going to be to claim that this was sort of inadvertent when it seems like so many of their anchors were actually going to these sources trying to get evidence of voter fraud and then being told that there was none. and then going on television and claiming that there was fraud and lying to the audience. what do you make of what the potential jurors were being asked today questions like do you personally know or have an opinion on rudy giuliani? sidney powell? mike lindell, the pillow guy? have you ever served as an election judge or volunteered at a polling place? have you ever had any capacity in connection with the 2020 election. jury questions that
prosecution s expert witness as having borderline personality disorder. what does that mean? what could be the understatement of this particular case. they do not do real well with rejection or abandonment. jodi arias is essentially the 21st century version of the character that glenn close played in fatal attraction. if there was any time during the trial when jurors tipped their hand about how they felt about jodi arias, it came over the course of two days when they questioned her directly. arizona is one state where jurors can actually ask questions of the defendant. the judge reads them. did police ever find your grandfather s gun while the tone was not as biting as that of the prosecutor, those jury questions were overwhelmingly full of skepticism and disbelief. why did you place travis s body back in the shower? why not just tell the police the truth from the start? after all the lies you have
if there was any time during the trial when jurors tipped their hand about how they felt about jodi arias, it came over the course of two days when they questioned her directly. arizona is one state where jurors can actually ask questions of the defendant. the judge reads them. did police ever find your grandfather s gun while the tone was not as biting as that of the prosecutor, those jury questions were overwhelmingly full of skepticism and disbelief. why did you place travis s body back in the shower? why not just tell the police the truth from the start? after all the lies you have told, why should we believe you now? the lies that i ve told in this case are can be tied directly back to either protecting travis s reputation, or my involvement in his death in any way. because i was very ashamed. and that s what this would all boil down to. all of jodi s