Here, she is not an expert in clerks and refused to answer the questions. Yeah, throughout the day today, beginning early this morning, our team has been outside of the courthouse alongside numerous other members of the media and everyone was anticipating or waiting for potential indictment against the former president today and earlier today there was buzz or information circulating he had been indicted and reuters published the indictment around the lunchtime hour thachl generated buzz that the indictment had come down. All of a sudden the Fulton County clerk office said those are not correct, legitimate documents, they are fictitious, there is no indictment. Fastforward to immediate night and the indictment is remarkably similar if not identical to the document that surfaced today on the county website, it generated a lot of questions. How did that get up there, on a Government Website . Tonight when the District Attorney was asked about it, she said she had no comment, she is not a
he stated he pled the fifth under the advice of counsel declining to answer the questions. this striking legal development, which we ll get into comes just two days after august 8, 2022 when the fbi searched a former president s home. both developments show the depths of donald trump s legal problems. neither means that he is in a legal sense guilty of anything to be precise. both mean that the concerns about donald trump s guilt about law breaking, about criminal evidence and criminal activity stretch from the highest levels of the doj to a separate new york probe to inside donald trump s mind. only he can make the decision that he made today. and let me tell it to you in plain english, it s a right he can exercise, but he made the decision, donald trump did that he faces a higher risk by testifying truthfully in the new york probe, which he chose not to do than by pleading the fifth, which he chose to do. it is a legal but a controversial move, which he has probably derided
devastated and angry. - result. we are heartbroken, devastated and angry. we l result. we are heartbroken, i devastated and angry. we may result. we are heartbroken, - devastated and angry. we may never truly know devastated and angry. we may never truly know why devastated and angry. we may never truly know why this devastated and angry. we may never truly know why this happened. - devastated and angry. we may never| truly know why this happened. words cannot truly know why this happened. words cannot express truly know why this happened. words cannot express our truly know why this happened. words cannot express our gratitude - truly know why this happened. words cannot express our gratitude to - truly know why this happened. words cannot express our gratitude to the l cannot express our gratitude to the ury cannot express our gratitude to the jury who cannot express our gratitude to the jury who have cannot express our gratitude to the jury who have had cannot expre
compassion to her morbid curiosity and her fake compassion. too many of them returned compassion. too many of them returned home to empty baby rooms. many surviving children live with permanent consequences of her assault permanent consequences of her assault upon their lives. her attacks assault upon their lives. her attacks were a complete betrayal of the trust attacks were a complete betrayal of the trust placed in her. my thoughts are with the trust placed in her. my thoughts are with the families of the victims who may are with the families of the victims who may never have closure, but who now have who may never have closure, but who now have answers to questions which had troubled them for years. i will now hand had troubled them for years. i will now hand over to my colleague janet wall from now hand over to my colleague janet wall from cheshire constabulary. lama i am a family liaison coordinator with i am a family liaison coordinator with cheshire i am a f
are single defendant cases. when you have co-defendant cases, you have ripe opportunity for effective assistance of counsel, trying to sever the charges and sever the defendants, split the charges. one jury should not hear all evidence against all individuals and here is one reason why. when you allege conspiracy which rico charge is essentially conspiracy and almost 41 charges levied against all or some defendants in this case allege conspiracy for theft, for influence and obstruction of justice. jury cannot hear co-defendant s statement in furtherance of this conspiracy. by the very nature, way the case has been pled by this office will necessitate mults multiple