now. back to you. thank you very much. tomorrow, jurors begin day 2 of deliberations in the john edwards corruption trial. he is charged with six felony count, accusedded of using nearly a million dollars from wealthy donors to cover up an affair with his pregnant mistress, rielle hunter. jure oners have to decide if he knowingly and willfully broke campaign law. we have a defense attorney and a former federal prosecutor here. thank you for joining us. thank you. thank, shannon. jennifer, i want to start with you. a lot of folks see the trial of roger clemens here and they say, it s a waste of government time and money to be trying folks they are trying to make examples out of them. is that what s happening with john edwards? i believe that s what is happening. i dont believe this case should have gone to a jury. what is compelling is that the
how she can say that all the jure oners were sick to their stomachs of mind not finding her guilty. why? why can t i happened it? they can believe she was guilty but feel like there was not enough evidence presented to convict her. but my point is, they what s the word their standard of evidence has been artificially enhanced, thanks to modern culture tv that they expect a video showing the killing. that s my reason. i don t think that s true. i think what they oar. it s called reasonable doubt. i am against reasonable doubt. if it s 85%, i am happy. how sure are you of anything these days? well, i think the main problem well, when somebody s life is on the line, you want to be pretty sure. the main problem was because of the state of decomposition of caylee anthony s body, they couldn t determine the cause of death, let alone who did it, so