Put what on the president . This idea that you just said the the New York Times is reporting that the president approved either wrote or approved the that is not an outlandish suggesting. I take the the New York Times reporting on its face and why wouldnt a father thats president of the United States want to have a say in what his son was putting out that involves him and his presidency. Seems like a legitimate thing thats why i asked. 39yearold son whose running the Trump Corporation and the trump organization, so he doesnt need to be looked over the shoulder by his father. Heres what i think we need to really focus on and obviously i appreciate you having me on. I need to be clear about three things here. Number one, the president was not aware of the meeting, did not attend the meeting and was only made aware of the emails very recently by counsel and not seen the emails. In fact, you know, i didnt see the email until yesterday and im one of the lawyers. So there you have it. Okay.
different crimes. and sometimes what you the proposition you started with turns out to be completely wrong. if you were sitting down with hope hicks today, what would you bsk asking her? as a prosecutor? yeah. so there are two specific areas that everybody knows that she might have information about. one is the statement that was crafted by the president, apparently, himself, on air force one, on the way back from europe last july, when they were trying to figure out what they could say about the meeting that donald trump jr. and paul manafort and others had at trump tower with some russians. so that s one episode in which she apparently was very heavily involved. and where she said, according to mark corallo, who was a spokesman for the president s legal team, said the e-mails, the don junior e-mails will never get out, and that left corallo with the impression that she was trying to obstruct justice. we should say that hope hicks lawyers deny that. right. so as i und
other than it seems to be on the end of the trump individual, a big nothingburger. big nothing burger meaning a meeting about russian adoption so says reince priebus on camera to the entire nation. that s what he said, not true. back in washington, according to the new york times, the president held a conference to calm the story with hicks when she allegedly said that the don junior e-mails, those ves very incriminating e-mails and i quote will never get out, because only a few people have access to them. nobody has to know. so what s ha mean? hicks attorney strongly denied that account calling it completely false. there was another person on the conference call, someone reportedly willing to recount the story you just heard to robert mueller. that would be mark corallo. a spokesman for the president s legal team or at least he was. he told colleagues he was alarmed by hicks comment concluding she was either being naive or was suggesting that the e-mails could be withheld fro
and after about 20 minutes it, the meeting ended. i don t know how much about it other than it seems to be on the end of the trump individual, a big nothingburger. big nothing burger meaning a meeting about russian adoption so says reince priebus on camera to the entire nation. that s what he said, not true. back in washington, according to the new york times, the president held a conference to calm the story with hicks when she allegedly said that the don junior e-mails, those ves very incriminating e-mails and i quote will never get out, because only a few people have access to them. nobody has to know. so what s ha mean? hicks attorney strongly denied that account calling it completely false. there was another person on the conference call, someone reportedly willing to recount the story you just heard to robert mueller. that would be mark corallo. a spokesman for the president s legal team or at least he was. he told colleagues he was alarmed by hicks comment concluding she
i know steve bannon, michael flynn. he was in touch with michael flynn, general flynn? yes, as well. what do you make of that, malcolm? well, what i think is fascinating is she is giving voice to what we already believed the muller investigation had. we re just getting more color in depth. we re not going to hear about this from muller until muller starts indicting other people, right? right. that s a man of action. he does not mince words. he comes out and hits you with an indictment. she s letting us know principle players on the donald trump junior e-mails that were carbon copies, that were carbon copies on the k.t. mcelderry fasahidec memo, all of these peoplefarlan of these people will move up to the top at some point and muller is doing it in silence. she s telling us what she heard