Iesbring those hesitanc and bring those doubts. Host we believe that there. The rice hasson is executive director of the catholic womens form at the ethics and Public Policy center. Thank you for your time. Up next on washington journal, we will be joined by karen mills and current senior fellow at Harvard Business school. We will talk about income equality and how it is impacting u. S. Competitiveness. Our weekly euromoney segment, we will take a closer look at Student Loans debt relief programs and the potential cost to taxpayers. We will be right back. All persons having business before the honorable and Supreme Court of United States are admonished to draw and get their attention. Number 759. Marbury and madison is probably the most famous case this court ever decided. Existed as enslaved people here on the land or slavery was not legally recognized. Putting the brown decision into effect would take president ial orders and the presence of federal troops and marshals and the courag
Is not my first trip to newport. When the synagogue asked me too come. We just let everybody know this any other religious affiliations you want to invite me too newport im good with that this is such a beautiful campus for the more i learned about the university in the days and weeks leading up to this event, the more impressed be here and to be with people who, as the president said are deeply committed to Public Service of various kinds. So thank you very much for giving me the chance for a quick thank you very much for being here. Were thrilled to have you here. Most of the folks here are graduates, a lot of time to do events like this at law schools. It is been a while since i was in a college or speaking to non law students. If i ever start may being too in the weeds. You will just tell me. Your reluctance might be but not here. Wonder if we could take you back to your life as an undergraduate at the university. What kind of student were you. I was a good student. Have activities
Not again. Affirmative action was prohibited in California in 1996 when voters passed Proposition 209, 55% to 45%. That was affirmed in 2020 when Proposition 209, which would have repealed 209, was defeated by a bigger margin, 57% to 43%.
Not again. Affirmative action was prohibited in California in 1996 when voters passed Proposition 209, 55% to 45%. That was affirmed in 2020 when Proposition 209, which would have repealed 209, was defeated by a bigger margin, 57% to 43%.
Not again. Affirmative action was prohibited in California in 1996 when voters passed Proposition 209, 55% to 45%. That was affirmed in 2020 when Proposition 209, which would have repealed 209, was defeated by a bigger margin, 57% to 43%.