and , you know, with with with my questioning, it waswhatd just sort of otherworldly. the question to me was, whattwi these twitter files say abouwht censorship by surrogate, which is what i was testifying on andw what i talked about.itte the case law. has those are twitter files. the the twitter files has twitter has confirmed the authenticity of those files. efore,the day before. former twitter officials confirm any of these factsan. and the members simply asked, what is this say about, yo censorship? u ner woand the response here w well, you ve never worked fory twitter. it s likone wouldn t testify in the pentagon papers unless i worked at the pentagon. it. you re right. you re right. they never should have published it because they didn t work at the pentagon to begi i n with .e an so it is it is reallyf an fascinating. was there any part of any democrat that, you know,u the party of the aclu, whicht ci was supposed to be about civil e liberties and free speech? i mean, i ve l