Please take roll call brinkman and, present. Borden will be with us shortly as well director heinicke nolan, present. Ramos, present. Please be advised roger rubke will be absent from todays meeting but you do have a quorum to proceed with business at hand. Item 3 announcement of probation sound producing devices during the meeting. Item 4, approval of the minutes of the october 18 regular meeting any Public Comment boomer . Know mister chairman moved and seconded. All those in favor say, aye so ordered. Item 5 communications. German nolan directors none. Item 6 introduction of new or Unfinished Business by Board Members 52 things to bring up with from the headlines. The first is if we could perhaps get clarification or update on the Service Animal policy. I know that was a new story that was kind of waiting around and i think that its one of those things theres a lot of misinformation out there. You hear a lot of things dogs are okay if they paid up there. Service animals always okay
Books and Government People an enormous 0 Online Library for researchers and humanitarians or anything that has this interest like sherman or mr. Peabody the movie text and tv news is all archiveed it is mr. Broadcastos theyve brought together people in the part of vision the internet archives and receives doomentsz physical materials from all kinds of resources i see here that im going to go into the data numbers but they have two to three million adversities a day that goes to archive. Org they scan millions of boxes and employees people on clement street in San Francisco and the available selections are all there including way back machine that allows you to look at sites as at the existed a day ago or 10 years ago if they existed 10 years ago and e books nine hundred thousand now broots their archives theyre trying to bring the Digital Inclusion and the supervisor eye building in but they thamd to richmond, california is wireless assess and not just free wireless assess but were su
If we over turned the appeal what would your process be. Im sorry to uphold the appeal. Overturn the, sir certification all correct. We would act according to whatever the finding the board of supervisors made as to the specific deficiency the eir and take whatever steps would be necessary to bring the Internal Revenue back through certification and bring the project approvals back for reconsideration okay im going to more often and talk about the Economic Feasibility one of the things weve heard consistently this evening and in many neighborhoods merging and id like for you to discuss the Planning Department roll in reviewing the Economic Feasibility analysis provided by the consultant firm. This is the analysis on the alternatives that are analyzed. Thank you so ill start in responding this Economic Feasibility analysis was prepared by the project sponsor not at the behest of the Planning Department the feasibility was not the basis for decisions about the approvals of project or any
Heard the person believes that of flaltd and because it used the present land value instead of the lands use is there any legal stand. Doorstop mirena burns through the president i think i want to address one point and more directly the pot about the land value the first point i want to address is that the alternatives feasibility studies way part of the Planning Commission Decision Making around approving the project the ceqa findings that are discussed were the ceqa approval for the project not the certification finding what is before this board a certification of the eir not the project approval so there is two different slightly different standards for looking at alternatives depend on where youre looking an analysis versus a reservation to a project for the process of approving the project. Maybe i can rephrase are you able to talk about the ceqa appeal before the board and whether or not you doing the presents land value is the appropriate standard. The board is looking at the re
Ceqa findings that are discussed were the ceqa approval for the project not the certification finding what is before this board a certification of the eir not the project approval so there is two different slightly different standards for looking at alternatives depend on where youre looking an analysis versus a reservation to a project for the process of approving the project. Maybe i can rephrase are you able to talk about the ceqa appeal before the board and whether or not you doing the presents land value is the appropriate standard. The board is looking at the reasonable range of feasible alternatives to the projects under consideration like the project approval Decision Maker was the Planning Commission had enough options to look at it and the eir actually did not reject any of the four alternatives discussed as the 3 alternatives discussed rather as imagine feasible it looks like at the potential feasible this metal shed alternative the presentation the reduced density and the n