On the trail: GOP leaders working to keep N.H. ‘first-in-the-nation’
Published: 4/30/2021 4:46:10 PM
All the drama over New Hampshire potentially losing its century-long status for holding the first in the nation presidential primary is concentrated on the Democratic side of the calendar.
And that’s the way New Hampshire GOP chair Steve Stepanek would like to keep it.
Stepanek told the
Monitor that he and the other top Republican Party officials in the Granite State are not aware of any current threat to the state’s cherished primary position in the GOP presidential nominating calendar.
Stepanek, who was re-elected earlier this year to a second two-year term leading the state party, said that he and the chairs of the other four early voting states – Iowa, South Carolina, and Nevada – as well as the Republican National Committee members from the four states, held a hospitality session at the group’s spring meeting in Dallas last week.
(New Hampshire Primary Source is a regular feature of WMURâs political coverage.)A PRIMARY PACT. New Hampshire Republican National Committeewoman Juliana Bergeron said Friday sheâs been fielding calls from concerned Granite State GOP members after a report surfaced this week that officials in Nevada will push to move their presidential nominating contest ahead of New Hampshire in 2024.Bergeron said that she, New Hampshire Republican National Committeeman Chris Ager and NHGOP Chair Steve Stepanek met with their counterparts from Nevada and the other two early voting states Iowa and South Carolina at the mid-January RNC winter meeting in Florida.âThere was a pact,â she said. âAll four states are sticking togetherâ â not just on the fact that the four states should continue to be early voting states on the presidential nominating calendar, but on the order of those states as well.That order has long had Iowa as the first caucus, New Hampshire
provided under recovery acts, students with special needs, including significant improvement at the preschool level. we are focusing on needs in the rural communities. each of our grant proposals will include criteria are priorities targeting or areas specifically. we welcome the input of congress as we work to ensure that all of our competitive grant programs give strong opportunities to brous schools. we want to see a community in america have excellent opportunities, our children and our nation deserve no less. what that improved opportunity at up to is and turned is a return investment. according to a recent study the benefit of a college degree compared to an investment that would turn 15.2% per year. we know that the engines of our economy and its global competitive environment is the best educated for force in the world. it is the only way to build a strong, vibrant, and growing middle-class. we know that giving every child an opportunity is the right thing to do. it
.k i m not talking behalf on the asian-american pacific islanders, but since i am one, i want to bring it to focus that we don t have for that population. it appears that population has been increasing in the amount quickly. many of us are not employed. many of us are not in the habit of having health insurance until we are very sick. many of us rely on family , andrt, extended family many stay and die at home. we may not be a burden to the system. now that there is a mandate coming, i feel like the cost of healthcare can be reduced significantly with prevention, education, and treatment, and also in the exchange. understanding of the public can play a significant role. is there anything we can do to educate that population, and i also want to bring in the latino american friends because we are all the same and away, so is there any plan for that? i would be happy to jump in and explain how we thought about this. depending onogram, who your source is, and we have the flex