same bag as an american. blitz, since church hill s second, and there is the queen, and had is why britain s monarchy is superior in many carrying the beauty and excellence. ways than the american hi, i m chris matthews, welcome to the show. presidency. the system works because you today, john heilemann, andrea have, you channel all of your patriotism into this person, mitchell, katty kay and andrew into this family. sullivan. first up, is the country in such you don t have polarization. bad shape especially with the i have had experiences just disastrous new jobs numbers that with moments with the queen when mitt romney can become the first she was here and also over there president since nixon to win and one of the things that is without being especially liked? not well known about her is can romney be the savior voters that, look, this woman has don t warm up to but decide they traveled the globe and has met every head of government, every need? we know americans rate
campaign gifts that may not have been seen as campaign gifts when the supreme court declared now that corporations and individuals can now gi unlimited campaign cash. with me now are people who may or may not agreement. pete williams, and savanna guthrie. thank you for joining me. you re the ones i look to for legal understanding i have my own gut beliefs obviously. here he is after the juror let out. here is some of the first things he said. thank you for the jurors and their incredibly hard work and their diligence. they took their job very, very seriously. as we saw both during the trial, the attention they paid to the evidence during the trial, the presentation to the lawyers, and the fact they have now spent nine almost nine full days deliberating trying to reach a fair and just result under the evidence of the law. all i can say is thank goodness this country has the system it has. i think those jurors were an example of what juries are supposed to do. there you hav
evidence during the trial, the presentation to the lawyers, and the fact they have now spent nine almost nine full days deliberating trying to reach a fair and just result under the evidence of the law. all i can say is thank goodness this country has the system it has. i think those jurors were an example of what juries are supposed to do. there you have a well thought out call of the jurors that just sprung him. i must say i seldom heard anybody found not guilty to say thank you for the jury. have you heard of hung jury on five of the six counts giving a salute for greatness? they could not reach an agreement that he is applauding. when you re a defendant anything but a conviction you re thank you for. savanna, i thought it was an example why he was such a great trial lawyer. i thought it had the right tone, you did not see him doing a victory dance, he did not call out the prosecutors, he made it clear he did not think he committed any crimes, but he made it cl
money, and i believe public attention. he has not been found guilt on one charge, the jury deadlocked on all the rest. i have questioned this case since day one. this is what we see in developing countries. i don t like the fact that a republican prosecutor, a hold over, brought this case against edwards and then went to run for congress and won the primary. i m happy to see a case as we have here brought for taking campaign gifts that may not have been seen as campaign gifts when the supreme court declared now that corporations and individuals can now gi unlimited campaign cash. with me now are people who may or may not agreement. pete williams, and savanna guthrie. thank you for joining me. you re the ones i look to for legal understanding i have my own gut beliefs obviously. here he is after the juror let out. here is some of the first things he said. thank you for the jurors and their incredibly hard work and their diligence. they took their job very, very seriously. as
be the pied piper leading the legal understanding i have my own gut beliefs obviously. here he is after the juror let mer americas and the children of the out. world together, that was so here is some of the first things beyond any level of self he said. thank you for the jurors and awareness as to be almost path logical. their incredibly hard work and did i make myself clear? i think you did. their diligence. it just, sometimes the they took their job very, very shameless the shamelessness seriously. of public figures, especially as we saw both during the trial, politicians, is astounding to the attention they paid to the evidence during the trial, the me. you have to have a certain evil presentation to the lawyers, and the fact they have now spent of shamelessness to be in public life and to run for office. nine almost nine full days deliberating trying to reach a to do that in this o was just mind boggling. fair and just result under the i m sorry, it s mind boggli