i m getting old. an unhear is probably close e. i want to make sure that we did this really closely. for population purposes, the population in the highlighted area is 1991 people, bringing the deviation to district 96.58%, and the deviation for district 1010 -0.67%. and somebody was right collecting input in the portal at over 2000 people. i guess with the obvious trade- offs the thing is, if you put that in there and you put north of mission all the way to the freeway, then they have those people. i am thinking of district 10 that would be over populated. i just want to see the numbers. i would like to point out that if you want to try some of these things out, it is very quick to underlit again. don t be shy to ask us to draw one. are we shy? we are a number of things, but shy? you want the entire perkin there? park in there? 23, 26 who obviously. obviously. 16,058 people. district nine, 18.08%. cn wan we look at patrero asn alternative? and
i want to please ask you to really think about district 9. people in the community thought that the meeting that we had at the horsemen was the meeting that we were holding for the mission and as when they gave their input to bring the community together up to the freeway. i m one of the people that said no and i continue to feel that it doesn t belong there. those people are divided by the freeway and don t want to be connected to the mission. i am really concerned about that. i am not going to give up on that until the end. this is really helpful, but the way, to hear what is on everyone s mind. one thing that a sort of a new thought, and to some extent, maybe a little bit of a reversal of some work we did last week. i am the sinbad and our current working draft, the jimmy that is going i am noticing that in our current working draft, the chimney that is going is a slight overpopulation because we moved about during or the boundary, that is one thought. in the general
to amend the charter of the city by amending the provisions adjusting retiree benefits and health-care benefits. supervisor kim: my apologies. the chief sponsor of the amendment is supervisor elsbernd and so i will turn the chair over to him. i may have to leave and attend the budget committee, which is another committee i am a member of as well. supervisor elsbernd: we can do that real quick. we can do it real quick. two minutes. supervisor kim: my apologies. we do have a item number four, which we moved over so supervisor weiner could attend the budget committee meeting. i just wanted to open that up for public comment. many members of the public may have expected the item to come up now. we did want to give everyone a chance to speak on the charter amendment. supervisor elsbernd: differ item four, supervisor weiner s proposal. i thought i watched this on tv earlier this morning. i was not aware he would be switching things around. i am asking you not to put this charte
amongst the community. i think it shines through. it is something everyone else will benefit from. mr. alonso stood out to me as someone who would bring a breath of fresh air to something that was highly political. he would be the everyman at this committee. i think that would be very, very helpful with the group, and i think that group of three brings elements of diversity which we are striving to strike. it matches up well with the three who have already been appointed by the election commission, and it leaves the door open for few appointments from the mayor. so, those would be my top 3. supervisor kim: i think i concur with my colleagues that that wek at balancing the other three members, to make sure there are a variety of perspectives and keep in mind those already appointed by the elections task force. given who has been appointed already, a heavily lean towards an asian-american and latino, as well as members from the east side of the city. i was very impressed with o
i applaud everybody for being up here because it takes a lot of guts to get up here in front of you all, in front of supervisors, and just put it out there and at times get grilled. i am speaking on behalf of i am really supportive of maria and lupe. this task force is the right place where we could have new blood, new insight, a new generation of community activists that really want to contribute to our city. me, myself, personally, i can understand and feel a lot of their inspiration and vision and their roles on this task force coming from immigrant families. families that are not politically engaged because the countries that our families come from, you get disappeared. we get killed. to us being the new generation, me on the older cusp of the new generation, the being engaged, being out there. cutting their teeth on community campaigns, building new parks, curbing youth violence, clamoring for affordable housing. i see juanita taking that next step. to see her mature p