senate judiciary report, but they ve also got their own investigative work that they can rely on. we know from the transcript now that they pulled the select committee pulled meta data from some of the letters that jeffrey clark was involved in, and it implicated the white house. you tweeted that the january 6th committee members have been making the point that former white house chief of staff mark meadows is cooperating a lot lately, but not all clear that he intends to cooperate in a way that the committee imagines. what do you mean by that? yeah, this was really interesting. and it goes to the point about the collect committee is announcing its cooperation and mark meadows and his attorney also announced their cooperation. the problem is, if you speak to both sides, they have a very different understanding of what cooperation entails. if you speak to the select committee and house investigators, they say, look, you know, no topic is off the table. and they expect mark meadows
and you should just hold off at a signing year electors, or maybe tell the state legislatures that they can decide whatever electors they want. then he suggested that it be replicated in each relevant state. this was basically the doj using the power of the department of justice in the united states government, to intervene in states and given them cover to overturn the election. and sent trump electors to washington. early january clark s pressure had turned to this crazy outright threat, his own kind of coup within a coup in the department of justice. again according to the judiciary report, clark eventually inform the acting attorney general rosen, again this is his boss, that trump had offered to install him in rosen s place, and told rosen, he would turn down trump s off, or if rosen would agree to sign that proof of concept letter. clark has denied he plotted to overthrow rosen, but according to the report, trump in clark only backed off, they were nowhere meetings, the three are
justice of the united states government to intervene in the states and give them cover to overturn the election and send trump electors to washington. by early january, clark s pressure had turned into this crazy outright threat, his own kind of coup within a coup within the department of justice. according to the judiciary report, clark eventually informed acting attorney general rosen, again, this is his boss, that trump had offered to install him in rosen s place, and told rosen he would turn down trump s offer if rosen would agree to sign that proof of concept letter. clark has denied he plotted to overthrow rosen but according to the report, trump and clark only backed off. there were a number of meeting, a three-hour meeting at one point after several senior justice department leaders banned together and said we will resign in protest if crow do this, and the fallout will overshadow what you re trying to do. in fact, former acting attorney general jeffrey rosen whose role
insurrection that was not an attack on democrats in congress, it was an attack on the entire government, including the republican sitting vice president. to me, it s a sign of their weakness. obviously, to your question earlier on, what in god s name are they hiding? after all this insurrection was spontaneous, they must have had nothing to do with it. if you read some of the senate judiciary report about the desperate measures that the president was taking in the days leading up to the insurrection, we will know that many of these actors know much, much more. we will learn what their responsibility was for an attack on our government by americans holding and wielding and beating people with the american flag and with the trump flag. i m glad you brought up the senate judiciary report. i ve been thinking about this. we discussed it on the sunday show with a senator who is on the judiciary committee, a part of this investigation.