complained about so far in this process. the judiciary process going forward, allowing the president to participate. see if he ultimately does. they re trying to shift the argument away from the facts collected by the house intelligence committee and now the house judiciary considers what remedies are needed, whether impeachment is needed. that s what the debate will be. all facts point to the signs the president within weeking could be impeached by the house before the senate considers whether to remove him from office. i heard two key dates. december 25th, the deadline for the entire house to vote impeachment. manu, you have crucial news in the inquiry regardings $400 million the president withheld in military aid from ukraine. what s moved on that? reporter: the house budget committee provided a summary of documents it received from the white house office of management and budget about the $400 million in aid to ukraine, and the questions about why it had
president trump s winter white house and the first place, then when it came to the judiciary process for her, she basically fired her defenders, or public defenders so that she could represent herself in court even though he had limited english skills and of course she lost her trial decisively. inside the u.s. courthouse in downtown fort lauderdale, that chinese businesswoman, 33-year-old has been held in custody since she was arrested in march after penetrating through secret service security at trumps mar-a-lago palm beach resort. when she showed up that saturday, she first claimed she was there to use the pool even though she had no swimming suit with her. then when she got her the second layer of security, the mar-a-lago staff ran her name and discovered she was not supposed to be there and she claimed to be there for had been canceled and because of what she had on her triggered all kinds of speculation that perhaps she was either a chinese spy or an
news. what does that feel like? it s kind of amazing because you hear about it all the time and certainly our colleagues have been subject to it, but it really points out how all of these facts are kind of taken out of context and weaponized for people s own political ends and we think it s really unfortunate because it obscures the hard work we re doing to put the facts out there so people can make an assessment on the merits. one thing that s become clear, brian, the fbi investigation in the view of many americans and many people who care about fair process was too short and too limited in scope. you have shelden whitehouse calling for a further investigation into the investigation, you have jennifer ruben of the washington post calling for something similar. a desire to make sure, number one, we have information about kavanaugh and more in our book than anybody has seen, but to make sure the senate judiciary process, the nomination and confirmation process to the supreme cou
power imbalance. kavanaugh has the white house. he has those in charge of the committee all behind him. democrats are desperate to stop that, and some argue ford has been stained by her indirect connection to their efforts, which did cause a delay. and for all the talk of sympathy and empathy, before a word of testimony has been heard, with each passing day more and more partisans are doing what they do worst. they re twisting the situation to suit their purpose. just a few hours ago at the white house we heard their communications director saying that they are still 100% behind judge kavanaugh. what happened to she should be heard, he should be heard, there should be a process? 100%? how can they be 100% unless they ve done something to discover the truth or falsity of these allegations? if not, how can they be certain? all these questions seem to
let me make one thing clear. the industry that s been the hardest hit through allegations of sexual assault and sexual harassment is probably the media. maybe that s because we take it the most seriously. and done the most to try to get to the truth of the allegations. yes, taken very seriously. and not rush people through a process and put them in front of a hostile panel. you want me to name names of people in the media who are no longer in the media doesn t that show the need no, no. and now i m going to make amends with all the women that i ve hurt and sexually assaulted and sexually harassed. that isn t exactly how it went down, and we can name names. why waste my time. you seem to be waste time no, no, no, you re not being honest, you re besmurching two