tonight s angle. now, how often have we seen the press try kind of pretend that religious americans are part of a fringe movement? liberals warn of christian nationalism and even link the faithful to domestic terrorism. now, these same elites relish seeing headlines like this. christianity in the u.s. is quickly shrinking and they re gleeful to report that millennials are turning against organized religion. and if you are someone who offers thoughts and prayers after tragedies, well, they assume you re just a fraud. we are not going to give them thoughts and prayers, which to me is just the rhetoric that we ve used. the thoughts and prayers that you just referred to . it has done nothing to stop the epidemic of gun violence. a liberal high school administrators, let s not forget about them. they felt threatened by public displays of religion for decades. now, remember, joe kennedy, a beloved football coach at bremerton high school in washington state? he lost his job for
right now, the conversation we re having is will we changeep the rules committee so that we what wstop doing what we are dor like you re talking about explai having a democrat versusworkin republican . explain to me how what we ve been doing is working.me.g out e . right. but my question is didn tthing, and i m not privy to everything ,but didn t did he not puteedo a number of freedom caucus members? didn t h ae already agredye to u guys have specific and top positions in the key committees? no, i know. i know.commtees. know some of them aren t some of them aren t like waysnd and means or appropriations, but thos oe committee. yes. correct. no judiciary.e co yes. correct. this is thjudicie judiciary. onj weud have republicans,e reality jim jordan s on judiciary. this is the reality, though. lastthough night, a presentatio of an offer was put in front ofo kevin and he walked away from it. ndand guess what?ng to hepa then went out and said that people were looking to try to pad their res
mark: feel the power. if you say so. no doubt nancy pelosi finds all of this praise highly enjoyable. why throw it away by letting the senate take over the impeachment process and conduct a trial that could make her look bad? in silly? she has a better idea. already, her party is talking about introducing and voting on even more articles of impeachment. the impeachment of the week, with no senate trial insight. congressman matt gaetz presents florida, also on the judiciary e joins us tonight. congressman, i said, i think on christmas eve, instead of the no red santa tracker, no red ought to have impeachment article tracker, how long it is taking to do the 73 feet from nancy pelosi s office to the said no marks on it, somewhat over the jungles of new guinea right now, is she actually going to bring this thing home and
not, and i would lean toward bringing in obstruction because i think there are additional elements that have been forgotten, and there s a path there s a narrative about the president s entire activities as president. the trail that we have seen, the amount of obstruction, the amount of dismissal of the rule of law, i think that s a pretty powerful case. if you can make it simply with great clarity, i would lean in that direction. so procedurally, jennifer, it s interesting, the house intelligence committee is writing a report, but the judiciary committee will write the articles of impeachment. i was told this morning they ll hold hearings on what constitutes an impeachable offense. that s interesting. the question is when it gets to judiciary e the rules say that the president can have his own lawyers there. they can participate in those hearings if they re open hearings. do you think that the white house should do that? do you think that would behoove the president to have his pe