very conservative judicial philosophy. it very conservative udicial philosophyh very conservative udicial philosophy. very conservative udicial hilosoh. , ~ philosophy. it sounds like we should be philosophy. it sounds like we should be bracing philosophy. it sounds like we should be bracing ourselves. philosophy. it sounds like we l should be bracing ourselves for more contented to come. thank you very much indeed. you very much indeed. good speaking you very much indeed. good speaking to you very much indeed. good speaking to you. you very much indeed. good speaking to you. good - you very much indeed. (13mg. speaking to you. good speaking to you. take care. well, that news about the leaked supreme court document on abortion rights comes as voters in ohio have been choosing us senate nominees in a hotly contested race, one that many political observers say offers an early test of donald trump s influence over the party as he considers running for the presidency again i
brett kavanaugh or the time it took to vote on amy coney barrett, it s about the same, not much different and how much time it took which other panelist recalling racist. your reaction, molly? the unmitigated gall to say that respectfully voting for someone in then leaving after the vote is bad after what democrats put republican nominees through most notably justice cavanagh where they wer horribly to him. they accused him of being as serial gang on no evidence whatsoever. that was many democrats who engaged in one of the most shameful episodes of confirmation history. everything was respectful in this confirmation hearing. that s good, judge judicial philosophy should be analyzed everyone did did it in a property or inappropriate way and nobody made up lies about her, so that is more than enough . thank you. if you can t watch us live, make sure to set a series repor
The first black woman nominated to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to be confirmed Friday by the U.S. Senate without the support of either senator representing the
all socioeconomic backgrounds, races, religions. it doesn t matter. why don t we look for the right person, period. if you re looking for two things i m looking for merit and i m looking for judicial philosophy. not going to agree that the democrats have the right that is what it should be. but we should expect nothing other than those from joe biden and kamala harris bear let me tell you why. this is the least merit-based presidency in american history. as donald trump pointed out, barack obama holed up twice failed presidential candidate joe biden because they feel like he needed a white guy with experience in foreign policy even though he is always wrong. barack obama wins, joe biden goes along for eight years. then joe biden when he stumbles into the nomination because he promised a black female to a black congressman in a state he otherwise never would have won, he moves forward after really not being seen as a viable candidate. then he says, i need to pick somebody. who shoul
clarence thomas, a black man, just as productive it to him, he s a smart guy. but they put him in their thinking oh, a black man will go against voting rights. which is what he does. sean: identity politics, flat out racism and bigotry. but to the mob, the media, there s only one standard for democrats and another standard for far left judges. and one standard for the rest of us. when it comes to selecting judges, respecting the rule of law, judicial philosophy and the commitment to upholding the constitution should be the main factors determining who you are going to pick. these are important decisions that should not be made solely based on race or based on gender. in fact, it s disrespectful to the nominee to do so. but because biden s presidency is frankly imploding, even democrats and the media mob are now admitting it. he is now desperate to try to placate his democratic base that he is losing in droves as new numbers now show him at