comes to how the regulations can be applied. congress take a look at this and consider whether to have a postponement or a time-out. it s a perfectly reasonable position. kavanaugh in 2009 suggesteded that as a policy matter congress consider a way to provide fitting presidents with a temporary deferral of civil suits and criminal prosecutions and investigations. and in a january descent from the bench, justice had been right to view it as an unwise and unconstitutional departure from historical practice and a serious threat to individual b liberty. judge kavanaugh s judicial
overturning is deeply, deeply troubling. we already know he believes the president shouldn t be investigated while in office. that the president can t be indicted while in office. that a president doesn t have to follow laws that the president deems, his words, unconstitutional. clearly, judge kavanaugh s judicial philosophy incorporates executive power and accountability animated by a belief that our chief executive gets to play by a different set of rules. judge kavanaugh particularly after this interview, needs to recuse himself from anything having to do with the mueller probe. so, matt miller clearly chuck schumer and democrats think they re on to something here. in the simplest of terms, can you explain morrison v.olson and the distinction between the
your professional feelings or your thoughts on roe v. wade. laura: feelings don t matter for a judge. your feelings don t matter. the constitution matters. judicial philosophy. his judicial philosophy is well known. that is all i hear from the senators, that they disagree with his lower court rulings. laura: sol, final word, will he get confirmed? yes or no? he will definitely get confirmed but the real question about roe vs. wade that he clearly can t be asked, i don t care what you thought about roe vs. wade when it was decided in 1973. the question is whether or not it should remain valid law if a case comes before the court. everyone would agree that s just something you can t ask somebody who is a judicial nominee. have to try to glean it from his writings. laura: we can t prejudice future cases. fantastic segment about the view. thank you. while the left goes to extraordinary lengths to paint kavanaugh as monster, we expose
not be able to ask you what are your professional feelings or your thoughts on roe v. wade. laura: feelings don t matter for a judge. your feelings don t matter. the constitution matters. judicial philosophy. his judicial philosophy is well known. that is all i hear from the senators, that they disagree with his lower court rulings. laura: sol, final word, will he get confirmed? yes or no? he will definitely get confirmed but the real question about roe vs. wade that he clearly can t be asked, i don t care what you thought about roe vs. wade when it was decided in 1973. the question is whether or not it should remain valid law if a case comes before the court. everyone would agree that s just something you can t ask somebody who is a judicial nominee. have to try to glean it from his writings. laura: we can prejudice future cases. fantastic segment about the view. thank you. while the left goes to
matter, though, who is this candidate is going to be. that list contains some of the most brilliant jurists in the country. they are thoughtful, qualified, and wise. precisely because of that, people who do not like donald trump, who are very worried about what this new pick will do to their shift of the court, are not going to be talking about the constitution or separation of powers, or judicial philosophy. they are going to make this into a smear. it s going to be their best and only shot to try to stop someone because they can t do it on the basis of arguing they are not qualified. laura: bill donohue, the people of praise, this group of catholics who support each other, i guess they are a couple thousand across the country, is important to her as a mother and wife, something she s been a member of for some time, since her days at notre dame. that specifically is being used to smear her as essentially a cultist. your reaction?