In a Washington Dc courtroom. For the first time since the Supreme Court granted him limited immunity. What we expect next as the Justice Department fights to keep the case moving forward and to cnn lucid Christiane Amanpour sitting down with the commander in chief of the armed forces of ukraine, a candid conversation at a critical moment in the war against russia were following these major developing stories and many more all coming in right here to Cnn News central deciding the path ahead, the judge in former President Trumps federal Election Interference Prince case ended todays hearing without setting a trial date, but making it clear, shes not thinking about the 2024 president ial election when it comes to this case. A Judge Tanya Chutkan told trumps lawyers in a tense exchange, quote, im not talking about the presidency of the United States. Im talking about the four corners of the indictment cnn chief legal Affairs Correspondent Paula reid was at Court Today for the hearing. Wal
who did it, the real question is what happens next. is it the sign of something ending, or more likely is this just the beginning? and we re going to decipher judge-speak. do you know what a traveshamockery is? you ll know when i decode all the non-answers from judge kavanaugh. this matters. he has said and written things about issues that might come up. and has issued none of them. why are some senators okay with that? we have one of them here tonight, and we ll ask him. come on, let s get after it. the president is out to get whomever wrote that op-ed. his appointees are making these grand public proclamations of innocence, including the vice president of the united states, that trump is reportedly reviewing him, his new paul, rand paul, the senator is calling for lie detector tests to find the leaker. rand paul. isn t he the self-styled
anderson, thank you. i am chris cuomo. welcome, everybody, to prime time. the president is so hell bent on finding out who penned that op-ed in the new york times that he s even asking us to help unmask anonymous. but for all the intrigue about who did it, the real question is what happens next. is it the sign of something ending, or more likely is this just the beginning? and we re going to decipher judge-speak. do you know what a trafish mockery is? you know when i decode all the non-answers from judge cho kavanaugh. why are some senators okay with that? we have one of them here tonight, and we ll ask him. come on, let s get after it. the president is out to get whomever wrote that op-ed. his appointees are making these