you are dealing with the proposition of who is less bad. matt, how do you see it in the context of every time any journalism agency does a measurement of who lies more, your guy wins. some of the ratios have it 7 of 10 times he says something that is materially false. yet he is doing better than hillary clinton. why? i think the question of how is it possible in light of the billy bush tape and allegations that his numbers are better than hillary clinton. it is a big part of the electorate that is focusing on the wikileaks and the fbi had opened up or made clear a second investigation or two investigations on hillary clinton. we cannot cover those things. they are having an effect. what is the second investigation? you have the one on the e-mails and now the investigation on the clinton