Im an associate professor, sociology and Public Service here at New York University and im thrilled to be in conversation around this really great book. Im going to quickly introduce our author and commentator, and we will dive into into the conversation neill gross, author of this is a sociologist best known for research on Higher Education politics and academic life. He is the charles h. A professor of sociology at college. In addition to and to this book. He is the author of two other books. Why are professors liberal . Why do conservatives care . And richard rorty, the making of an american philosopher. He is also coeditor for other books. Patrick sharkey is, the william todd, professor of sociology and Public Affairs at the princeton of public and international affairs. His research focuses on urban violence and public policy. Sharkey was formerly chair sociology at here in New York University and served as scientific director at the crime lab in new york. He, too, is the author o
More television for serious readers. I am an associate professor of sociology and Public Service at New York University, and i am thrilled to be in conversation around this great book. I am going to quickly introduce our author and commentator, and we will dive into conversation. Neil gross, author of this book, is a sociologist best known for his research on higher education, politics, and academic life. He is a professor of sociology. In addition to this book he is the author of two other books, wire professors liberal, and why do conservatives care . And the making of the american philosopher. He is the coeditor for four other books. Patrick is the william s. Professor of sociology and Public Affairs at the Princeton School of public and international affairs. His research focuses on urban inequality, violence, and public policy. He was formerly chair of sociology here at New York University and serves as scientific director at the crime lab in new york. He too is the author of mult
From a bacterial infection he picked up on tour. He spent two nights in Intensive Care. Well bring you the details. Hello. Welcome to the programme, were live until 11. Throughout the morning we ll bring you the latest Breaking News and at 10 o clock well hear from labour whore setting out their Brexit Policy. And a little later well talk about the rise in food banks. As always really keen to hearfrom you do get in touch on all the stories were talking about this morning use the Hashtag Victoria Live and if you text, you will be charged at the Standard Network rate. Our top story today. Labour is to set out its policy on brexit, saying that the party would guarantee the rights of eu citizens living in the uk on day one of taking power. Sir keir starmer, The Shadow Brexit secretary, will also say retaining the benefits of the Single Market would become top priority in brexit talks. Hell stress that labour wouldnt accept negotiations ending without a deal, and will promise to give parlia
Silent. That was foolish and it was cowardly. This isnt about alex jones or any one person. Its about the central principle of our society and its at stake here. Do people have a right to communicate their views . It doesnt matter what those views are. Alex jones views or anyone elses views. They may be misguide or repugnant. They often are. There is a remedy for repugnant views, make a counter case. Defeat bad ideas with good ideas. Thats how society functions. We are moving in the opposite direction. Increasingly the people in charge use technology to see you lens criticism, mostly of them. The left will tell that you defending alex jones right to speak is the same as defending what alex jones says. That is a lie. They know its a Lifetime Achievement we would make the very same case on behalf of jill stein or chomsky on the left or anyone else the establishment was trying to silence. The left wing aclu spent about 100 years representing radical extremists who views they hated and the
Silent. That was foolish and it was cowardly. This isnt about alex jones or any one person. Its about the central principle of our society and its at stake here. Do people have a right to communicate their views . It doesnt matter what those views are. Alex jones views or anyone elses views. They may be misguide or repugnant. They often are. There is a remedy for repugnant views, make a counter case. Defeat bad ideas with good ideas. Thats how society functions. We are moving in the opposite direction. Increasingly the people in charge use technology to see you lens criticism, mostly of them. The left will tell that you defending alex jones right to speak is the same as defending what alex jones says. That is a lie. They know its a Lifetime Achievement we would make the very same case on behalf of jill stein or chomsky on the left or anyone else the establishment was trying to silence. The left wing aclu spent about 100 years representing radical extremists who views they hated and the