City of San Francisco sfgtv meeting of the Small Business commission occurring on april 11, 2016 will begin shortly. Public comment is limit today 3 minutes per speaker unless otherwise spbed by the office thorf meeting. Speaker are requested but not requiremented to state their name. Please deliver speaker cards to the Commission Secretary prirep prior the apruching the lectern. There is a sign in sheet at the front table for those that would like to be added to the mailing. Sf gov tv if we can have our slide, please. Need a theme song while we are waiting. There we go. We begin and each Small Business Commission Meeting that the office of Small Business is the only place to start new business in San Francisco and the best place to get information squl answers about doing business in San Francisco. The aufs of Small Business should be your first stop when you have a question about what to do next. We have a walk inophorous here at city hall, a phone number you can call and a website w
Advance in the process to prequalifying meeting. Not mandatory we ask all the participants to sign in and provide the Contact Information we post that as well as questions asked during the conference and the answers that we provided as well q and a we received from email and other needs by the deadline for questions or comments that we provide in the rfp q. How do we determine the 5 agencies. What happens there is a period of lets see our schedule i wonder if where we have the schedule in here we post of the rfp q and a schedule with certain meanwhile dates all culminating in the dates the proposals or the statement of kwfks we do so some of the interim miles are a preconference and date for questions to be submit by any interested potential vendors and provide a date for our Transportation Authority to provide a written response to those questions and the next milestone after that the date when the statement of qualifications are due to the Transportation Authority we allow a month be
Mr. [inaudible] of the aclu did a presentation where there were a couple comments. Namely the aclu report states that it is mr. Alex [inaudible] had extreme Mental Health conditions that were well documented [inaudible] public apology. [inaudible] who was only the nob fub after his death. Mr. Nito never had a diagnosis of Mental Illness and so the apology is accepted and hope that you take that [inaudible] any further Public Comment on this matter . Whether you choose tahold the Performance Review in public i think it is important you share what the standards and expectations are. It isnt about a particular chief of police but it things the public has a right to know what you expect of the leader of this department. What particular progress marks are needed and what things are promised that havent been delivered. Simple supervision and think that is a reasonable request at least that be publicly shared. Any further Public Comment . Hearing none Public Comment is closed. Sergeant call t