Perspective to plan [speaker not understood]. Technical difficulty; please stand by most of all let there be ron pearlman on this seat. Are there any more go ahead. Good afternoon, supervisors. Im alan orrick. I have been asked to read a letter in support of mr. Pearlman by richard noitras son. I am writing in support of Jonathan Pearlmans candidacy as San Francisco historian for the perez r vation commission. Although as a physician and epidemiologist, my own career was Environmental Health, teaching at harvard, ucla, uc berkeley, and then for 27 years heading up Environmental Health research at the California Department of public health. ~ i grew up with a family of architects. After my retirement, i have been helping cal poly pomona restore the historic 1932 studio residences designed by my father, richard noytra, one of the founders of california modern. I have been visiting with other historic modernist house museums around the world to learn about their restoration and programmin
Nakolian who will record each of our meetings and make transcripts available to the public online. Madam clerk, are there any announcements . Yes, mr. Chair. Please make sure to turn off all cell phones and electronic devices. Completed speaker cards and copies of any documents to be included as part of the file should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the march 19th board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. Thank you. Can you please call item number 1 . Item number 1, motion approving rejecting the mayors nomination for appointment of Jonathan Pearlman to the Historic Preservation commission, seat no. 3, for a term ending december 31, 2016. Okay. I believe mr. Pearlman is here today. Please approach the microphone. How much time do i have to make a statement . You dont have unlimited time. [laughter] im not asking for an hour. Two minutes. Thank you. Supervisors, thank you for having me here today. My name is Jonathan Pearlman. I would this ou
Architects. After my retirement, i have been helping cal poly pomona restore the historic 1932 studio residences designed by my father, richard noytra, one of the founders of california modern. I have been visiting with other historic modernist house museums around the world to learn about their restoration and programming. I was invited to serve on the Program Committee of the noytra house in los altos. It was originally a small residence of poet jacqueline johnson, designed by my father in the late 1930s. It has been restored and adaptively reused as an intimate conference venue. I have had the pleasure of working with mr. Pearlman on his Program Committee. What i have noticed about mr. Pearlman is this. He understands not only the importance of sensitive restoration and adaptive reuse, but also the intellectual Historical Context of original buildings. He is widely read in the history of architecture, although we are volunteers on that committee, he always follows through on what he
Johnson, designed by my father in the late 1930s. It has been restored and adaptively reused as an intimate conference venue. I have had the pleasure of working with mr. Pearlman on his program committee. What i have noticed about mr. Pearlman is this. He understands not only the importance of sensitive restoration and adaptive reuse, but also the intellectual Historical Context of original buildings. He is widely read in the history of architecture, although we are volunteers on that committee, he always follows through on what he volunteers to do. He is skilled not only as an architect, but also as a Graphic Designer and has been responsible for designing all the graphics related to the noytra house and its website. He has initiated a yearly house tour in the los all toes area whose income pay [speaker not understood]. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. Seeing no more people, Public Comment is now still open. [laughter] thank you. Are there any more speakers . Please come up, because otherw
The principal issue through the appeal related to the scope of project objectives, alternatives and analysis of [speaker not understood] population and employment, transportation, air quality and Greenhouse Gas emissionses in the eir. These issues have been previously addressed in the departments eir comments and responses document published january 9, 2012. Therefore the Planning Department recommended rejection of the eir appeal for reasons stated in its july 9, 2012 responses to appeal memorandum to the board ~ and supplemental staff testimony provided at the previous july 17th, 2012 appeal hearing. During the pendency of the appeal, the project sponsor cpmc has a revised project to include a smaller Cathedral Hill and larger st. Lukes campus. Relative to the previous project. Planning Department Staff has reviewed the revised project and notes that its similar but not identical to alternative create the alternative that was found to be environmentally superior in the eir. During on