comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Jonathan hudis - Page 1 : comparemela.com

TTABlog Test: Is

The USPTO refused to register the mark SMALL WINS for "sweets and candies, namely, gummies and soft candies," finding confusion likely with the registered mark BIG WIN for "candy.

Jonathan hudisWilliam verhosekSugar free specialtiesJudge jonathan hudisPrincipal registerTrademark act sectionSugar freeExamining attorney william verhosekTtablog test is quot small wins confusable with big win for candyIntellectual property

TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out? - Trademark

So far this year, the Board has affirmed 155 of the 167 Section 2(d) refusals on appeal (just about 93%)

Jonathan hudisMichaelb adlinTiny boxwood holdingsMarketing incDorinda medleyJudge jonathan hudisTiny boxwoodTtablog test how did these three recent section 2d appeals turn outIntellectual property

TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out? - Intellectual Property

The Board's shutout streak in Section 2(d) appeals is up to 33 affirmances and no reversals. Here are the latest three decisions. Has the streak been broken? How do you think they turned out?.

Jonathan hudisDavidk heasleyCheryls goodmanSunrise apparel groupFrontline millionairesPeople venturesJudge cherylJudge davidJudge jonathan hudisTtablog test how did these three section 2d appeals turn outIntellectual propertyEdiation amp arbitrationTrials amp appeals compensation

TTABlog Test: How Did These Four Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out? - Intellectual Property

As of one week ago, the Board had considered 29 appeals from Section 2(d) refusals this year and affirmed every one of them.

New zealand generalNew zealandJonathan hudisMichaelb adlinCynthiac lynchHyundai motor companyMoxley homesGruma corporationJudge michaelJudge thomasJudge jonathan hudisTtablog test how did these four section 2d appeals turn outIntellectual property

TTAB Affirms Section 2(e)(5) Functionality Refusal Of Serrated Knife Blade - Intellectual Property

Relying on Applicant's own advertising touting the design of its knife blade and its ease of manufacture (yielding lower cost), the Board affirmed Examining Attorney Caroline L. Moran's Section 2(e)(5) functionality.

Jonathan hudisCarolinel moranConverse incGb ii corporationKnife tool companyExamining attorney carolineColumbia riverTool companyJudge jonathan hudisTtab affirms section 2e 5 functionality refusal of serrated knife bladeIntellectual propertyArketing amp branding

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.