All right. Thank you for watching. Its time for the big show, cnn tonight, with its big star, d lemon. How you doing . Doing well. Yeah . Yeah, why not . Im so glad you said that. Why . Because you have that stock answer of better than i deserve . Oh, gosh, every time. I didnt say it. I know. So, i heard you talking, in the break, about with katie porter. Katie porter is no joke. No, shes not. Secretary mnuchin asked her if she was a lawyer today, like, as a snarky comeback. And congresswoman porter said to me, in the break, without, you know, violating any any confidence, she said i didnt hear him say that. Luckily, he didnt she didnt hear him. But, ill tell you, talk about boneheaded things to say. But, look, heres my concern. With what you see with mnuchin, does that leave what trump does yeah. See, thats what freaks me out about mary trump, her take. All those folks will leave. But the trumpism is not going to leave the party. That disposition. That disposition of im strong and wro
Let me tell you what im not going to do but im not promoting the book or any of these books and im not looking for headlines and honest to god interview where you can provide information to the American People, differentiate yourself from your opponent and it may shock the American People to know theres two candidates in this race. Press covers you but they dont cover joe biden very much. I want to start with the vacci vaccine. Im watching the News Coverage and for some reason the media and the democrats are very hostile to a vaccine, very hostile to the vaccine coming out quickly. Theyre trying to politicize this. The nine ceos of these pharmaceutical companies, including pfizer have said we are not cutting corners are following the signs so why do you think there such hostility from the Democrat Party, from my perspective, in the media about getting a vaccine in record type . They want to denigrate it. They started three weeks ago because they started hearing rumors that we would hav
Troops. Now, this is significant for a whole bunch of reasons. Remember it was about two and a half months you and i were talking about that time that President Trump invited the taliban to camp david and then cancelled it abruptly. And said all talks with the taliban were off. But at that point, the the intention of the president was very clear. That he wanted to bring down troops. At the time, we thought there were about 14,000. There were actually around 12,000. Bring that number down to about 8,000. Thats what this planned reduction, which they do through redeployments and through the natural course of events with troops going there. This wouldnt be like whole units are being drawn out of afghanistan. It gets you down to about 8,000. Now, whether or not what that does to peace talks with the taliban, its not quite certain. You mentioned that the peace talks have started again. But theyre actually, and they have. The white house quietly did that after the president made that unannou
Also with us tom nichols, usa today columnist. Hans, put this into context for us and the exclusive reporting that we have. So my colleague Courtney Kube broke this story that the white house intends to announce as early as next week this drawdown of troops. Now, this is significant for a whole bunch of reasons. Remember, it was about two and a half months ago that you and i were talking about that time that President Trump invited the taliban to camp david and then canceled it abruptly and said all talks with the taliban were off. But at that point the intention of the president was very clear, that he wanted to bring down troops. At the time we thought they were 14,000 and there are actually 12,000. Bring that down to 8,000 which theyll do through natural course of events going there. This wouldnt be whole units being drawn out of afghanistan. It gets you down to about 8,000. Now, what that does to peace talks with the taliban, its not quite certain. You mentioned the peace talks sta
Do is focus on this. They could be doing and they are thdeclaring their sustain for te americancl voter. This lawless partisan impeachment, is the political suicide march the democrats. Have you seen my posts the last four weeks. [applause]. During the panel this week, wall street journal. Dan and columnist a kim. And bill mcgurn. Dan largely along party lines nancy pelosi said impeachment to work as to be bipartisan. I guess you achieve that in a way. And the only people who voted our three democrats voted against three and two voted against both. And jeff andrew from new jersey, he is switching parties. Is that the outcome the she expected. I think it is kind of where she thought it was going. But part of it that i find surprising is that the intensity of the democratic commitment of impeachment as noted all throughout the drunk the impeachment collated this. Think some of d these democrats believe there is some sort of constitutional crisis in their making this great think and defen