potentially for three decades. so this needs to be done right. and i agree with what john is saying about anita hill in the hearings and the process. why can t we have a similar process to what we had back in 91? why is it that the committee is not calling for the kind of process that gives people confidence that this kind of discussion will be handled properly joel i m sorry, john what is the committee prom - proposing right now that s different than what anita hill had? first and foremost, the committee is denying opening up the background investigation to ensure we have as many facts as possible that could be used to provide the support to the witness testimony. that was done in the anita hill hearings. why is it not being done now? it was done before the name was leaked. it was not done after the name was leaked. the whole fbi process arthel: excuse me, john, hang on, joel, let me ask john a question. does that matter, the point you just made, john?
don t have self-control. flannery, flannery. i think you should take a chill pill, dan. we will cut your mike if you don t stop talking. he will talk and you respond. i would be glad to do that. jesse, if you actually read the search warrant which i did preparing for this segment, you will see in the search warrant that they clearly lay out the fact that classified information had been exchanged before between huma abedin and mrs. clinton as john said before. but john s leaving out the critical component of that. it wasn t done over a government system. hello. that s the whole component of the john was a lawyer for the government and is he leaving out the one component of the story. that s the actual crime. come on. you are a lawyer. crime requires intent. it requires. enough with the lilaing. let me ask john a question. john yes, sir. for the democrats to complain constantly about russia hacking this election, it s funny, it s
self-control. you are a liberal you don t have self-control. flannery, flannery. i think you should take a chill pill, dan. we will cut your mike if you don t stop talking. he will talk and you respond. i would be glad to do that. jesse, if you actually read the search warrant which i did preparing for this segment, you will see in the search warrant that they clearly lay out the fact that classified information had been exchanged before between huma abedin and mrs. clinton as john said before. but john s leaving out the critical component of that. it wasn t done over a government system. hello. that s the whole component of the john was a lawyer for the government and is he leaving out the one component of the story. that s the actual crime. come on. you are a lawyer. crime requires intent. it requires. enough with the lilaing. let me ask john a question. john yes, sir. for the democrats to complain constantly about russia hacking this
i opposed it because i wanted a public option. i wanted it to be paid for. i wanted discounts for form suitical drug. none of that was included in the legislation, but the day after it passed we worked together to make it work. affordable care act passed three years ago. where are the no interest in hearing any of the ideas. he doesn t act like it s the law. 14 times he s changed it. he said, no, don t pay attention to this part. just forget about this part. i m just going to push this off to the side. why wouldn t you work with us to make this work rather than sticking to this one-liner that we re going to repeal the program? i asked you about the pre-existing condition. you said no, you like that. i don t know how you feel about medicare part d, medicare. i ll tell you interrupting the life of so many americans. why can t we sit down and talk about this? there s too much partisanship in washington, no question on both sides of the aisle. we have to work together.
get this done. you guys on the republican side are going to have to give in on the unemployment insurance. you know it s true. that s why this vote s getting kicked back. why don t we just go ahead and get this thing done rather than terrifying all the american families who fear they re not able to get the support they deserve. a lot of american families are worried about their kids and grandkids in terms of the debt. and to throw this additional spending is borrowing more money against our kids and grandkids is something that does worry a lot of merps. when somebody loses their job, you want to help them. we have a social safety net out there. people get coverage for the first 26 weeks, so everybody gets that. and then the question is what additional this has been an emergency effort and to try to extend that is something i actually support, but we need to modify the program and cut other areas of spending to do it. i thought we were going to vote on this last week. the republican