macdonald, john tandy and rick unger. tame to get rid of the navigators? of course. this is something the insurance companies do every day and they should have their employees do it. the bigger picture in defense is they are a symptom of the much-bigger problem which is the obama administration s obnoxious conceit it can create healthcare market out of thin air. the better answer is to repeal it. rick, john is fur getting rid of them. but he is defending them. i heard that. i heard that. john is right about one thing you said, the insurance brokers have people like this, who help customers figure out what the best policy is for them. that is all the navigators are doing. i look at the report from the house committee. it was ridiculous. they relied on data provided by james o keith, who by the way, while they are concerned about the criminal behavior, he is the only one who has been convicted of a misdemeanor and had to pay over six figures to settle a case.
the private sector? we have seen that when they testify before congress. they have been less than forthcoming. john is right. in the private sector you are punished for doing illegal things or making mistakes. in government you are rewarded. rewarderred with more workers and more funding. you are also more einitiate the private sector. the private sector came out with numbers like these, spending that much money on the few enrollees would they be in existence? they would not. private sector is more efficient because if you are not, you are put out of business. business cannot exist without investment. if you misuse the capital they put you out of business. in government again, when you fail, you fail upward on the way to more funding for the failed ideas. clearly you have seen that happen before, have you not in government? sure you have. i ll tell you what i find really troubling. why are you all presuming bad behavior on the part of navigators? you have one bad apple. the
0 macdonald, john tandy and rick unger. tame to get rid of the navigators? of course. this is something the insurance companies do every day and they should have their employees do it. the bigger picture in defense is they are a symptom of the much-bigger problem which is the obama administration s obnoxious conceit it can create healthcare market out of thin air. the better answer is to repeal it. rick, john is fur getting rid of them. but he is defending them. i heard that. i heard that. john is right about one thing you said, the insurance brokers have people like this, who help customers figure out what the best policy is for them. that is all the navigators are doing. i look at the report from the house committee. it was ridiculous. they relied on data provided by james o keith, who by the way, while they are concerned about the criminal behavior, he is the only one who has been convicted of a misdemeanor and had to pay over six figures to settle a case. you know, this i
agree and he would have stopped because that s why he was called account silent called silent cal. the makeup of the presidency and the congress and in the senate today is similar to what it was after the $94 election. as i recall, the late 90s did well for the stock market. so john is right about gridlock. by the way, john, coolidge vetoed 50 bills while president. unlikely that the president will be doing that. do you think it s what is needed? one party or the other saying no to anything that comes their way? without question. economic growth is easy. it s the nature to grow. if you get the government out of the way, not legislating people can do what they are best at. there is no surprise that the stock markets are more confident. they are pricing a better future, because there will be very little legislation from washington. first and last word from john this time.
the fine? i don t think they will. the millennial predisposed to support the administration in general. if this administration require s young people to pay the fine they will have lost a generation of support. do you, rick? are they going to pay the fines? they will have trouble getting the fine. they are not high in the beginning, so i don t know. i m hearing more arguments across the point. insurance has always been, always, any kind of insurance is on the back of others. when somebody s house burns down, people two didn t have a choice about what kind of policy you want. no, you do not. obama forces to get this, this, this. maybe i only want that. then you don t get doctors and the hospitals in the back end. john, what is it? finish your point. they are forcing to us be on the backs of others. if we had a choice to pool what kind of pool to join in to, a different scenario. it s not that way right. ring, it s not that way with a