judge scarborough, your feelinges about watching that scene the last hour from bagram airfield? well, you re right. very moving scene. and i say that despite the fact that unlike john mccain and lindhy graham and other republicans, i was against the tripling of the number of troops in afghanistan. i believe we need to get home sooner rather than later. i believe that we ve been there too long already. that said, it was a very moving scene. and even though i disagree with the president s policy, i think the commander-in-chief needs to go over to afghanistan on a day like today to mark the one-year anniversary of an extraordinary moment. a moment the united americans in a way that we hadn t seen since after september 11th, that was the killing of osama bin laden. is he politicizing this event? yes, he is. is that a big surprise to any of us? no, you have as we talked
out by 2012, 2014. i said 2014 means 2020. i suspect 2020 now may mean 22025. and it is very troubling. i think it is a big mistake. but chris, bottom line is, a lot of republicans aren t happy regardless of what the president does, just like democrats aren t happy regardless of what the republican commandener chief does. the world keeps turning, as my grand mom used to say. i don t want it think about what neocons happy because that means moving the united states military the middle east and be at war with any of the countries at any given moment. that s why they are happy. they freeze republicanes from speaking out, the way i m speaking out tonight. the way george will has been speaking out. there are republicans that say to me privately they agree with me, that we didn t need to triple the number of troops. but they followed john mccain who followed by lindsay graham
michelle, there is a lot of controversy, a lot of questionable figures that have been identified with this. so much so that governor perry seems to be doing the michael jackson moon walk away from his event. is this a major stumble for him coming out on the national political field? i think if perry is trying to introduce himself to the nation as a whole, he has gone about it in a very questionable way. as you know this isn t just about him talking about his religion for christian beliefs or whatever. there are a lot of people involved here including john haggee who john mccaine took a lot of heat for. he accepted that endorsement. base he has come outs with not just can t eye catholic statements but you know, all kinds of interesting things to say about muslims as well. so he is have picked
donors. i went back and look at at the speech that mccaine gave to apec and it was about wanting to talk without preconditions. so the 67 line is where they stopped the fighting with the 49 war and there was a checkpoint. it is a tricky place. no one thinks that line will be restored. that exact line. because israel will keep control of most of jerusalem. we know that. let s take a look. the president said his position is nothing new. let s listen to the president here. there is nothing particularly original in my proposal. this basic framework for negotiations has long been the basis for discussions among parties including previous u.s. administration. if there is controversy then, it is not based in substance. when what i did on thursday was to say publicly what has long been acknowledged privately.
conservative of views on this issue is to be supportive of same sex relations along the line of, that s your thing. i ll do my thing. it is none of my business and what goes on in your bedroom is none of my bez. you have ken melman, former rnc chairman in support. actually very active raising money for marriage of quality in new york state. you have john mccaine s campaign manager. you have the cheney family. there is a lost encouragement in terms of the republican party for support. even though the house republican leadership which tends to be on the far right is defending the defensive marriage act in an ociferous way. we should encourage more republicans to be supportive. clearly the american people are siding on the side of fairness. they are coming on the side of fairness.