Thats probably not going to happen for another 50 years. Dangerous colds ice over millions. Tempers below zero. Another foot of snow in boston. Oh yes. Gh litning strikes. Episode of thundersnow. People in the south are getting their own winter wallop. Theyre bracing for snow. Egyptian war planes struck isis targets in libya. Likely retaliation for the 21 christians be headed. Two men are charged with aiding the suspected gunman that killed two people in copenhagen. From comedians to actors to alec, 40 years of live television. Kanye, sit down. Im having a great, great big time. We remember the people that we lost. The people that we missed. The people that we love. An american is in intensive care this morning after he was gored during a bullfighting festival in spain. A scorpion stung a woman before her flight from l. A. To portland took off. Everybody started freaking out and put their feet up in their seat. Madison square garden playing host to the allstar game. Russell westbrook s
In washington you have the house and the senate that want to go different directions. People will talk about the good old days of bipartisan compromise, by telling you how old they are. Because it is true that 30 or 40 years ago the republicans would get together with the democrats and they would argue about todays topics. All fights in washington dc work bipartisan. Going up to nixon. Lifetimeagans nice the twoparty sorted themselves out. Lon wants a more constrained view of the government, one wants a expanded view, and they are heading different directions. One wants to go east and one was to go west. What would compromise look like . Government, bigger and we have revised between bigger and much bigger credit each guy would go back to his corner and say you know, i got is a really good to have more than they wanted or less than they wanted. We were always compromising for bigger government. Which was not the direction that we want to go. Now we have one party that wants to go to le
Freezes t then asset, and travel bands should follow. Those have been put in place. On i believe further action that front should be taken at on on thursday. Should be responding to the fact this have annexation. Further f there is action to destabilize the ukraine further consequences follow. We need to set that out on our day in concert with European Partners and put down a lear warning if there was further destableization then we a position of the orts of economic sanctions we discussed last week. Given the totally totally illegitimate actions they have taken and the g seven allies next week in the hague. That theynconceivable remain in the g8. Further and decide . Cally i think its unthinkage to go as planned. Strongly support the g seven of meeting that will take place on monday. I think its important we move together with our allies and and i think we should be discussing whether or not to from russia permanently the g8 if further steps are taken. Thats the meeting well have on i
Is u. S. Supreme court heard oral argument in questioning the constitutional treaty parties. The case bond versus the u. S. Involves governments prosecution in that pennsylvania woman under federal a federal law designed to ban chemical weapons. The woman was found spreading toxic chemicals on her friends personal property. The underlying issue in the case is the question of when the federal government may intrude on powers traditionally given to the states. In this case police powers. Here is the oral argument to that case. We with her arguments in case 12. 158 bond versus United States. Mr. Clement. Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court. If the statute at issue here really does reach every malicious use of chemicals anywhere in the nation as the government insists it clearly exceeds congresss limit limited and enumerated powers. This court cases that may clear the bedrock of our system that Congress Backs the General Police power to criminalize conduct without regard to juris
Gas it makes sense to say those are chemical weapons but with respect to otherwise harmless chemicals the only thing under the governments theory that turns them from chemical weapons weapons chemicals into chemical weapons as a verb. Its their malicious use in that puts it yuan an odd situation. If congress had come in and said look there are certain chemicals that by their very nature are almost inherently weaponized congress would have a lot more authority to proceed. Counsel we permit that in all sorts of definitional sections of the criminal code. We call a dangerous weapon anything that you used to inflict serious injury on someone. I dont think of a car is necessarily a dangerous weapon. Its something i used to transport myself. Its only when im using it for a prohibited purpose that it turns itself into a dangerous weapon. So i am having a problem with this noun herb distinction. Why isnt the intentional killing and burning of another human being using chemicals the essence of