The central corridor plan is probably going to take another two or three years. Before it goes into effect, [speaker not understood]. Yeah, thank you. Thank you. Good afternoon, commissioners. Im john goldman of goldman architects. I spoke to you two weeks ago. We are the architects of the 343 50 11th Street Project which is now painted purple and is therefore very obvious on the street. To reiterate what cory was saying, we have an active permit submittal that was put in in 2005. Because of the western soma planning process and the eir process for the western soma which started actually after we submitted, we were told by planning that our project could not proceed unless my client paid for their own eir, which would be about 150,000. We were also told if they waited, there would be an eir for the whole western soma and they could get a community exemption, which would not be too expensive. So, theyve been diligently waiting and ive been diligently and patiently noting the ongoing pro
Theres more documents out there i want to see the assessors records there maybe other things theres 5 in the front as well and the market is right. I saw a photograph the entrance it looks like a two unit building. Thats part of the hearing. Exactly. If the commissioners decide. Just to follow up when where i was going if the request has not been filed planning and the other departments wont have recognized this. We having would have begun and done our inspections then we could look at it and resend the permit to see if its issued in error thats another thing people request and youre right we would have just inspected it. Something to add mr. Sanchez. All right. I renew my motion to grant the jurisdiction question. We have a motion to grant the jurisdiction request. On that motion. Commissioner fung arrest commissioner hwang. Commissioner president lazarus and commissioner honda thank you. The vote is 5 to zero the jurisdiction is grand and she now has a 5 day appeal period and this en
There no exterior connection and the allegation its removed dont have any evidence this is a clear a singlefamily dwelling dwelling and we rely on dbi and the report as we final record of notice the final records are not also correct. Ill note this was advertised and what we can tell the materials submitted on the overhead as a 5 unit in the front and 2 in the rear that was need in the record. So again, i think maybe department of building inspection can shed light but the Additional Research and the Water Department records they indicate there are that more unit than a singlefamily home so this will be submitted to make an appropriate decision on the matter my mr. Sanchez in terms of the definition the question of the executive order and how they denied the number of units i thought normally it would be the number of units relates to a lot. Vs. I know whether theres multiple structures and the density is based on the number of lots in the inclusive directive it states the number the l
The allegation its removed dont have any evidence this is a clear a singlefamily dwelling dwelling and we rely on dbi and the report as we final record of notice the final records are not also correct. Ill note this was advertised and what we can tell the materials submitted on the overhead as a 5 unit in the front and 2 in the rear that was need in the record. So again, i think maybe department of building inspection can shed light but the Additional Research and the Water Department records they indicate there are that more unit than a singlefamily home so this will be submitted to make an appropriate decision on the matter my mr. Sanchez in terms of the definition the question of the executive order and how they denied the number of units i thought normally it would be the number of units relates to a lot. Vs. I know whether theres multiple structures and the density is based on the number of lots in the inclusive directive it states the number the lots and not unit this is an appro
Some of the facts there would be legally two units the fact theres two exterior doors the permits subject to the jurisdiction request why is there no exterior connection and the allegation its removed dont have any evidence this is a clear a singlefamily dwelling dwelling and we rely on dbi and the report as we final record of notice the final records are not also correct. Ill note this was advertised and what we can tell the materials submitted on the overhead as a 5 unit in the front and 2 in the rear that was need in the record. So again, i think maybe department of building inspection can shed light but the Additional Research and the Water Department records they indicate there are that more unit than a singlefamily home so this will be submitted to make an appropriate decision on the matter my mr. Sanchez in terms of the definition the question of the executive order and how they denied the number of units i thought normally it would be the number of units relates to a lot. Vs. I