specifically with debt reduction in mind, they feel they have response that nobody hears them. about taking them out. that was defeat them at the polls is the way i read it. the only story, the real story is cosmic hypocrisy of the democrats. as john indicated, the shooting in tucson, all of a sudden that was obviously the act of a psychotic mad man. i remember saying very early hours of the drama. and it was found that the shooter is a paranoid psychotic. and yet for four days there was unrelenting vitriol from the left, some commentators, comments about how this was caused by the somehow the climate. front page of the new york times asked the day after, not an editorial but a reporting story, talked about the climate which had a been created. it was nonsense from the
enough to handle it. brett: john? couple things, it s nine or ten support for every one fighter, we have 3,000 troops, eight hour shifts, that is hundred fighting guys for every eight hours. that is not a huge number for protection. in 2004, john kerry organization or 2006, i could understand the argument of who wants to be the last soldier to die for a cause. that cause is not lost anymore. we have expended enormous sacrifices, whether it was a good idea or not, is a debate that his tar torians can now have. the fact is we got to the other side. so they are willing to wash their hands of it and we are setting themselves who lost iraq argument for the next decade if this goes badly. brett: juan brings up the politics in iraq but what about the politics in the u.s.? does the president gain that
graham all reacting and moments ago, dianne feinstein put out a statement saying, quote, i think it s too fast, that is my view. democrat saying there are serious things going on there that need to be stopped. white house says the negotiations are continuing. let s bring up our panel. john goldberg, juan williams and charles krauthammer. charles, 3,000, 35,000, whatever the number ends up being. it s significantly less it appears than the generals on the ground wanted to begin with. there is irony here that democrats said bush administration for not sufficient troops in iraq. as a result it was a difficult to protect our troops and to achieve the mission. in large part they were correct.
specifically with debt reduction in mind, they feel they have response that nobody hears them. about taking them out. that was defeat them at the polls is the way i read it. the only story, the real story is cosmic hypocrisy of the democrats. as john indicated, the shooting in tucson, all of a sudden that was obviously the act of a psychotic mad man. i remember saying very early hours of the drama. and it was found that the shooter is a paranoid psychotic. and yet for four days there was unrelenting vitriol from the left, some commentators, comments about how this was caused by the somehow the climate. front page of the new york times asked the day after, not an editorial but a reporting story, talked about the climate which had a been created.
enough to handle it. brett: john? couple things, it s nine or ten support for every one fighter, we have 3,000 troops, eight hour shifts, that is hundred fighting guys for every eight hours. that is not a huge number for protection. in 2004, john kerry organization or 2006, i could understand the argument of who wants to be the last soldier to die for a cause. that cause is not lost anymore. we have expended enormous sacrifices, whether it was a good idea or not, is a debate that his tar torians can now have. the fact is we got to the other side. so they are willing to wash their hands of it and we are setting themselves who lost iraq argument for the next decade if this goes badly. brett: juan brings up the politics in iraq but what about the politics in the u.s.? does the president gain that